News: World News
ROME (ChurchMilitant.com) - The Vatican suppressed the full contents of the Third Secret of Our Lady given to the three children at Fatima, the Catholic Church's most prominent whistleblower has revealed.
In an bombshell interview, Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò suggests that the Third Secret involved Our Lady's warning of a grave apostasy from the Catholic faith, with the Church's hierarchy accepting secular and modernist thought in the latter part of the 20th century.
"Until a few decades ago it would have seemed incredible that we would reach the point that even Our Lady could be silenced, but in recent years we have also witnessed attempts to censor the Gospel itself, which is the word of her divine Son," the former papal nuncio to the United States told Portuguese Catholic media Dies Irae Tuesday.
Viganò, who has accused "the very top of the Church's hierarchy" of covering up systematic homosexual predation, alleged that the Vatican began "a cover-up operation" to bury the Third Secret when Pope John XXIII declared on Feb. 8, 1960, that the Church "does not wish to take on the responsibility of guaranteeing the truthfulness of the words that the three shepherd children said the Virgin Mary spoke to them."
The secret was consigned to oblivion "because the content of the message would have revealed the terrible conspiracy against the Church of Christ by its enemies," disclosed the prelate, who has been in hiding since releasing an 11-page testimony in August 2018.
This conspiracy was aimed at creating an apostate "modernist and Masonic ... neo-Church" whose purpose was not to save souls "but to constitute itself as the spiritual arm of the New World Order and an advocate of universal religion."
According to Viganò, the Fatima cover-up operation continued in 2000 during John Paul II's pontificate, when Cdl. Angelo Sodano "presented as the Third Secret a version of his own that in several elements appeared clearly incomplete."
Further, Viganò revealed, secretary of state Cdl. Tarcisio Bertone interpreted the Virgin's words as a prophecy of the assassination attempt on John Paul II in order to lead people to believe that the 1917 message of Fatima "had nothing to do with the crisis of the Church [in the decades after 1960] and the marriage of modernists and Freemasonry that was contracted behind the scenes at the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965)."
In his interview, translated into English by Christopher Hart-Moynihan and posted in The Moynihan Letters, the whistleblower questioned why Our Lady's appeal for the Pope and all the bishops to consecrate Russia to Her Immaculate Heart went unheeded. Popes over subsequent decades have consecrated the world — but not specifically Russia — to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
"Was it so costly to do that?" he asks, lamenting that Pope John XXIII "preferred to walk the path of détente with the Soviet regime" not "understanding that without God no peace is possible."
"Today, with a president of the Russian Confederation who is certainly a Christian, the Virgin's request could be granted, averting further misfortunes for the Church and the world," he urged.
Describing the new church as "a deformed and monstrous creature that does not come from God," Viganò explained that "the [Second Vatican] Council's revolution first had to demolish the Church's heritage."
The "revolution" would seek to annul the priesthood or make it "ineffective by extending it to women, who cannot be ordained" as "happened in the Protestant and Anglican sects" which has resulted in having "lesbian female bishops in the so-called Church of England," lamented the bishop, who is now on the Vatican's most-wanted list.
Vatican II, he observed, also diluted the ontological nature of the priesthood by insinuating "a certain equivalence between the ministerial priesthood deriving from Holy Orders and the common priesthood of the faithful deriving from baptism."
Responding to a question on Pope Francis' new commission to study the possibility of a female diaconate, Abp. Viganò compared the pontiff's "fiddling with the Catechism to declare the death penalty 'not in conformity with the gospel' — something unheard of and heretical" with the attempt "to create ex novo some form of female diaconate, evidently preparatory to a future introduction of the female priesthood."
"Ecclesiastical celibacy is also the object of the same attack, because it is distinctive of the Catholic Church," he added, noting that "the ecumenical 'pretext' — that is, drawing closer to dissident communities by acquiring even their most recent errors — is based on Satan's hatred for the priesthood and would inevitably lead the Church of Christ to ruin."
"Bergoglio has adopted the so-called situation theology, whose theological pillars are accidental facts or subjects: the world, nature, the female figure, young people," Viganò elaborated. Rather than having "God's immutable and eternal truth as its founding center," this theology "starts from the observation of whatever is the current pressing need of these phenomena in order to give answers that are consistent with the expectations of the contemporary world."
Asked what faithful Catholics who felt abandoned by their shepherds were to do, the archbishop said: "We feel isolated, of course: but didn't the Apostles and all Christians feel this way as well? Did not Our Lord even feel abandoned in Gethsemane?"
"These are the times of trial, perhaps of the final trial. We must drink the bitter cup, and even if it is human to implore the Lord to let it pass from us, we must repeat confidently: 'Not my will, but Yours," remembering His comforting words: "In the world you will have tribulations, but have courage, for I have conquered the world!'"
Tags:
Views: 137
As I recall, St.Pope John Paul the Great wept bitterly when he was told the third secret of Fatima. Pope Francis, as far as I can tell, hasn’t given much verbal thought to it. I am confused by much of what he has said and done. Abp. Vigano May have a point, but he has bitterness in him. We should take what he says with with a grain of salt and look into what he has said prayerfully on our own. Ideally this type of thing should be kept within the Vatican until every word is backed up with proof. I don’t know Pope Francis does what he does or says what he says. He must have advisors ; he can’t seem to censure himself on his own.
I guess everyone views things differently. I don't see any bitterness in Archb. Vigano. He just has a fighting spirit to me, and he would have to, as he has put his life on the line to expose the truth.
I do believe every word he said here because it adds up to what we already know.
<3
The solution is a simple one. Publish the Third Secret as it was intended to be. Then there will be no more intrigue or cloaking in shadows. Clearly, the Church is suffering through a Great Apostasy and the world is entering a chastisement, it is time for Our Lady's words, prophecy, and admonition to be given to the faithful and the world.
Precisely!
Michael said:
The solution is a simple one. Publish the Third Secret as it was intended to be. Then there will be no more intrigue or cloaking in shadows. Clearly, the Church is suffering through a Great Apostasy and the world is entering a chastisement, it is time for Our Lady's words, prophecy, and admonition to be given to the faithful and the world.
Unfortunately, there's a teensy little problem: the people who have possession of the original message are the same ones who are lying about what it says.
Dawn Marie said:
Precisely!
Michael said:The solution is a simple one. Publish the Third Secret as it was intended to be. Then there will be no more intrigue or cloaking in shadows. Clearly, the Church is suffering through a Great Apostasy and the world is entering a chastisement, it is time for Our Lady's words, prophecy, and admonition to be given to the faithful and the world.
ABP Vigano might have chosen a rather aggressive medium to reach out to the faithful. I dislike the way Church Militant presents things, their choice of words, etc. I might be mistaken, but it seems to me that they are not different from the common media whose main goal is to get as much viewers as possible no matter what.
Despite all, let's patiently await in constant prayer The Triumph of our Lady, mindful of Christ's promise: "the gates of hell shall not prevail against His Church."
I am no fan of Church Militant either, but I'm not a fan of most "Professional Catholic" commentators. They all have particular axes to grind and only accept their view of church crisis. I find it funny how they have their hands out all the time and imply if people don't support them, they will close up shop. Let them close, I think it may end some of the divisiveness among traditional Catholics. I wonder what they would do if there was a truly conservative and orthodox pope? How would they make money and sell their books, bling, and cruises? That said, Abp Vigano is a voice in the wilderness fighting against and exposing the corrupt and vile members of the Church, that seek to destroy it from within.
Absolutely. I pray he will witness the fruits of his "onesome" endeavour in this lifetime.
Michael said:
I am no fan of Church Militant either, but I'm not a fan of most "Professional Catholic" commentators. They all have particular axes to grind and only accept their view of church crisis. I find it funny how they have their hands out all the time and imply if people don't support them, they will close up shop. Let them close, I think it may end some of the divisiveness among traditional Catholics. I wonder what they would do if there was a truly conservative and orthodox pope? How would they make money and sell their books, bling, and cruises? That said, Abp Vigano is a voice in the wilderness fighting against and exposing the corrupt and vile members of the Church, that seek to destroy it from within.
Joseph,
You're not being a wet blanket. What you present is the truth. Father Gruner paid an enormous price for speaking the truth.
(Kindly don't read this with a snarky tone as that is not my intent. I really just don't get the point.)
What does, what he did yesterday have to do with what he is doing today?
Cardinal Burke was an outspoken critic of those who believed Russia was not consecrated and he also now is admitting it wasn't and calling for it to be done.
What ever these men did or did not do in the past they have to answer to God for, but if they are trying to right the wrongs should we be focused on before? Does that really help the situation today?
© 2024 Created by Dawn Marie. Powered by