We know Rome’s playbook for destroying Traditional Catholic communities. One such method is the introduction of trad-hybrid Novus Ordo masses. I suppose the destroyers serving Rome regard this as the kinder alternative to killing Christianity. Other methods are the more base, clear shut down of diocesan TLMs. In these situations, the masks are off, and the malice of the bishop is on full-on display. Sometimes, these bishops clearly have great difficulty hiding their smiles from public view when they deliver the bad news. And the passive-aggressive messaging in their shut-down letters is unmistakable.
But when there is a Society of St. Pius X chapel in town, why, that’s a harder nut to crack. Synodal Rome doesn’t have direct power over those situations. Thus, they are forced to pressure such communities out of existence through the means of migrating and corralling people. (Kind of like how Globohomo uses immigration to displace our people and destroy our countries. The “movement of people” is weaponized.)
So, for example, if there is a Society chapel in town, the Synodal Religion gets a knee jerk reaction, and must spring into action to push that chapel of town. And so what happens? Someone somewhere higher up on the totem pole starts having conversations. Perhaps the presbyteral council is chitchatting with a puppet bishop. Or maybe orders are coming down from a cardinal. Whatever the case, the decision is made to introduce an FSSP chapel, and thus the local war begins against that SSPX chapel that they despise.
And what happens after that? All of the people craving proper worship of God—people who’d rather “offer the sacrifice of Abel than the half-hearted sacrifice of Cain”—stream into the FSSP chapel. It’s “the safest bet” in the laity’s minds. The FSSP chapel gets lots of normies and others who aren’t too sure about the politics of all this stuff going on. All they know is that they want authentic worship, and not modernist crap. Perhaps they realize that the Society is good and responsible for the survival of Traditional Catholicism, but things are more cozy at the “official” chapel. So they go to the FSSP.
And then what happens? A “Rome-sanctioned” community of Traditional Catholicism springs forth, and people are having full parish life in these “acceptable” Trad communities. Meanwhile? The SSPX is still sitting there, perhaps neglected from decreased traffic, watching oodles of Catholics pass on by without ever giving it a chance. Because they already have their Trad life goin’ on. And to go to the SSPX Mass…well, doing that sort of thing is more of an active, political decision more than anything at this point. I mean, you’ll get a good and meaningful sermon that has no fluff. That’s for certain. But it won’t be cush. Your kids might not have a playground to play on. There might not be a parish hall for everyone to sip coffee in. It won’t be very…churchy.
So people flock to the FSSP.
And then what happens? After a few years, the SSPX chapel finds that it might not be serving a purpose anymore. And the boys up in Kansas where they operate from might decide to withdraw their priest. And then? Boom. The SSPX is no longer in your town. The Synodal Religion won. And after that? The diocesan structure starts withdrawing its “trad” mechanisms. Celebrity priests are reassigned. Nuns are moved out. Diocesan trad priests are shuffled out of sight.
And that FSSP chapel? Maybe it stays. Maybe they’ll withdraw it. Depends on Prevost’s mood. But the Society is gone, so it has no use anymore.
I know this story well, because it happened in Tulsa. It’s funny, when it came time to obtain property for the FSSP building, did they put that building anywhere in the city near any real cultural centers? Absolutely not! They built the FSSP chapel in the ass-end of town, next to the refineries. It’s clear how the diocese feels about its Trads. To this day, I’ve never seen the Fraternity featured in one single issue of the Eastern Oklahoma Catholic. Ever. (I could be wrong. Maybe it’s there. But I haven’t seen it.) This, even though there are three masses a day and a vibrant community of hundreds of people.
Was this truly the grand, long-game plan in Tulsa? No one would’ve claimed it at the time. But in hindsight? Sure looks that way.
Corralling the Trads
Only he’s not really “just a dad,” now, is he? He’s a priest. He’s an unlaicized priest in an apparently illegitimate marriage (due to his priesthood) with children, property, and Texas cattle. And he really doesn’t give a shit about that fact; if you follow the hyperlink I just shared, you’ll see it plainly.
I used to respect the guy. Really, I did. He blocked me for whatever reason. They never tell you why they do it. But I’m pretty sure this grifter stole an idea or two from me for his show. I overlooked it for a while. But he lost me with his flip-flopping after the latest Prevost antipope installment. It’s so pathetic and gross. If this hurts his feelings, he can pray to Saint Bergoglio of his Synodal Religion for guidance about that. Right alongside Gary Michael Voris.
Anyway. Once upon a time, when I thought he was interesting, I noted about how Taylor Marshall had this thing he liked to call “Corral Theory.” He was so right when he suggested this notion, I’m just going to post it right here:
Here is their trajectory. It’s what I call the corral. Down here in Texas—I live in Texas—we have a noun, “corral,” and then we have a verb, “corralling.” Corralling is where you get a bunch of animals—down here, cattle; it could be sheep, whatever—and, using dogs or cowboys on horses, you move them into the corral. You corral them into the corral, right? And the corral is a place where you can neuter the animals, you can brand the animals, you can send them up a chute to go and get slaughtered. That’s why you bring them into the corral.
And my suspicion—and I feel very confident about this—is that Pope Francis and the St. Gallen Mafia and the modernists—and, let me just be honest, the infiltration going back to the 1800s, the Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita; you can read the whole thing, it’s in the appendix of my book Infiltration—the plan is to move everyone who believes in the traditional faith. You know, Pope Francis has attacked that just by rewriting a catechism. The traditional morality—you know, we see this in Amoris [Laetitia], we see this regarding the death penalty. Moving pieces. Morality doesn’t have moving pieces. Saying, you know, injecting certain things into your body is morally virtuous, righteous, required, even though what’s contained in those things is gravely immoral. Pope Francis says these things.
And now the liturgy.
So the end game is to totally take over the Bride of Christ, the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. And then the people who love Christ, and love the Ever-Virgin Blessed Mary, Theotokos, Saint Joseph, the Apostles, the tradition, the feast days, the novenas—the people who want to hold on to what we’ve always been and say, “Whoa, whoa, you’re changing. You’re moving away”—their goal is to say, “We’re going to corral you over here. Corral, corral.” Then they get us inside the corral, and when every last one of us is in the corral with our priests and with our fellow laymen, they will swing that wooden gate closed. And here in Texas, there’s usually a chain. You wrap a chain between the gatepost and the actual fence. You wrap it, and then you put a lock on it. All the animals are in the corral. It’s containment.
- Taylor Marshall, Pope Francis Drops Bomb on Latin Mass, Targets Traditional Catholics in new doc Traditionis Custodes, July 16, 2021
You know, even though Marshall is a flip-flopping fake on his way out the door to join every other washed up RealCatholicTV psy-op, he did come up with some zingers in the past. Maybe that’s one of the gifts that come along with an indelible mark when you become a priest.
But certainly, the game that the Synodal Religion plays against Christians truly is a game of corralling people around like cattle. Father Marshall isn’t wrong on that point one bit. That’s been the game for a long time, now. Corralling populations this way and that. Managing demographics and people. Ignoring their humanity. They want to trick and manipulate us. There is no debate. No engagement. Only the movement of people and goalposts.
The pagan religion of the Synodal New World Order doesn’t want to destroy we, the cattle. First they want to separate us. Then classify us. Decide which gate to use and which pasture that we, the cattle, are to occupy. Fences determine how far we wander. We can graze, sure. Reproduce, even. And we’re convinced we’re free, even though there’s fences around us keeping us penned in. And for a lot of normies, it doesn’t look like persecution. For a lot of them, this looks like some sort of a nice comfy accommodation. We’re allowed our incense, our chant, our birettas and maniples. We get to preserve the old ceremonies. But only if we aren’t naughty, and we stay inside the designated area.
It’s an interesting and useful metaphor. However…
…Masks Off! Trad Inc. Are the Ranchers!
What the hell does this guy believe in? Mr. “I will pray to Pope Francis for his intercession.” As Chris Jackson said over at his blog, Marshall chronicled Bergoglio’s doctrinal wreckage for years. It’s absurd. And it seems to me that the man was likely not just a fake this entire time (as the sedes always maintained, to their credit), but an active party to this corralling action against Traditional Catholics.
It occurred to me lately: when Marshall was telling us that we’d be corralled into a “Trad cattle pen,” was he saying this because…that’s what he was doing, himself? Did he reveal this to his audience because it was actually “Father Taylor Marshall” who was corralling Traditionalist laity and corralling them into fenced-in compartments? Again, was this projection? Was he laying out his motives? An example of “accusation as confession?” Did Marshall know that this corralling action and subsequent declaration of schism would happen because he was one of the parties responsible for doing this to Trads?
I don’t think this is an unfair question.
There’s a YouTube video I saw in the last week—I lost it, however. I think the guy was talking into his phone in his car for 13 minutes. He was a fellow Traditional Catholic. Could’ve been a Sedevacantist. I’m not sure. I’ll link it here if I find it again (UPDATE: Just found the video. It’s by St AnthonyPadua RadTrad on YouTube). But this man was reflecting on all of these online personalities like Marshall, Sammons and others who’ve come online and sort of “made nice” with Traditional Catholics. And for a good number of years, these guys were very open and nice with us and in agreement with our outrage at Rome. And then suddenly—as if they were given marching orders—they turned against Trad Catholics. They did it in lockstep. Right after Prevost got installed as the latest antipope. Before that, you’d have Marshall coming out with videos like: Viganò: Pope Francis wants Latin Mass Schism. But now? Such videos are scrubbed off of YouTube, and it’s presumed that Bergoglio went straight to Heaven!
So what I am getting at is this: Perhaps Marshall and others are actually a cadre of multiple psy-op, controlled opposition figures who were meant to corral the Trads into a place where the right people would get labeled as schismatic, and others would compromise the way Rome wants them to. I mean, just consider the obtuse behavior of the Opus Dei crowd. They are completely unreasonable, and talking to them is like addressing a brick wall.
And you might think this is a silly notion. But you know what? We’ve already had the FBI casing our Trad parishes. We’ve all seen them driving through our parking lots and taking license plate numbers. We’ve all seen these guys plop down in our pews and attend our Latin Masses with us. They came out of nowhere. All throughout the Biden Regime, when we were being accused of being white supremacist terrorists, the FBI was hovering over us and waiting for orders.
So, no. I do not think it is beyond the principalities and powers of this world to insert bent psy-op agents into the Traditionalist talking circles. People like Voris, Marshall, Sammons and others aren’t stupid NPCs with no internal monologue. Heck—some of the topics they’ve covered in the past are good, well-reasoned points. But they are pawns, nonetheless.
I think it is the case that these individuals act with agency and intent. Either they always were, or they’re new tools for our adversaries. And both Langley and Rome have a vested interest in the various “culture war” spheres within American society, that they can’t leave well enough alone.
Maybe they’re just cowards who folded under Prevost. There’s that possibility, too. But this week, I don’t think so.
