THE DENIAL OF MARY'S CO-REDEMPTION, THE MESSAGE OF THE VIRGIN OF FÁTIMA, AND “THE ERRORS OF RUSSIA”By Father FLAVIO MATEOS

[Dawn Marie]

THE DENIAL OF MARY'S CO-REDEMPTION, THE MESSAGE OF THE VIRGIN OF FÁTIMA, AND “THE ERRORS OF RUSSIA”

The “errors of Russia”: Anti-Christian and naturalistic Jewish messianism, financed by internationalist bankers, implemented by Masonic lodges, in service of the Antichrist's world government.

By Father FLAVIO MATEOS

“Mater Populi fidelis” in context 

The recent document issued by the “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith” headed by the incompetent Cardinal ‘Tucho’ Fernández, signed by Pope Leo XIV on October 7, no less (consider that this date is the day of victory of the Church and the Virgin against the enemies of the Catholic religion), ambiguously called “Mater populi fidelis” [1], which in direct opposition to the teachings of Scripture, the Magisterium, and Catholic Tradition, the titles of Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix of all graces of Our Lady, has provoked many reactions among the Catholic faithful whose intellect and hearts have not yet been destroyed by the conciliar and synodal havoc. Deo gratias! But, predictably, and that is why this ominous document has been able to see the light of day, cardinals, bishops, and priests remain silent, or a few have had lukewarm or inadequate reactions to it. The same can be said of Catholic Tradition in general. No, we are not living up to what is required of us as disciples of Christ and children of His Mother. In some, zeal appears tarnished, dulled, overly cautious, while in others, over-acting highly-publicized reaction has exploded.

Good writings have been published on the Catholic doctrine of Marian Coredemption and Mediation, and some partial refutations of the Vatican's sputum [2]. Perhaps in the future we will receive an even more exhaustive document that demolishes the aforementioned anti-Marian document piece by piece and paragraph by paragraph. What we want to do now is to put what has happened in the context of the war we are fighting.

The images we see of Gaza, devastated and in ruins, are applicable to the spiritual situation of Catholics, who continue to be bombarded by modernists in order to build their synodal Church on the ruins of the Catholic Church, that is to say: a democratic Church, inclusive towards other faiths, and sodomite. This image leads us to talk about what no one else is talking about. Why did this document issued? How is it possible that the conciliarists say over and over again—and they have said it since Leo XIV took office—that they seek unity in the Church, and yet all they do is generate conflict? Well, what they seek—and this is something that conservatives and semi-traditionalists still do not understand, and will continue not to understand—is unity in the synodal Church, not unity in the Catholic Church. They seek unity within the new church that emerged from the Council. And they know that this unity must exist outside of Catholic doctrine, since Catholic doctrine and modernist doctrine cannot coexist. Hence the impossible coexistence of the Catholic or traditional Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass, which is Catholic in appearance only. There is a minimal margin of tolerance, or there was until now, but that margin is narrowing more and more. And this latest anti-Marian document—which, however, appears to be cunningly devoted to the Blessed Virgin—has made this clear. They have meddled with what is most precious to the “faithful people” whom they claim to want to shepherd. What remains after that? What will they not be able to meddle with? Does the neo-SSPX believe that it will be respected and that it will be given truly traditional bishops? “Mater Populi fidelis” is a guillotine in disguise. Only fools can swallow the story of the Vatican's good intentions. The author of the Vatican document is a sexual deviant, and the LGBTQ agenda is advancing merrily in the dioceses. Cardinals and bishops remain silent.

We believe, therefore, this is yet another phase, more painful and possibly one of the last, of “ the errors of Russia” working both within and outside the Church, in concert. These errors are not precisely “of today’s Russia”, but we will try to make ourselves understood.

The “errors of Russia”

On July 13, 1917, in her third apparition at Fatima, the Blessed Virgin mentioned the “errors of Russia” and anticipated that She would return to ask for the consecration of this nation (which She did on June 13, 1929). At that time, there were 117 days left before the Bolshevik Revolution took over Russia.

To understand “the errors of Russia” only as Soviet communism, Marxism-Leninism, is to reduce the problem to a specific formulation applicable only in a very precise historical circumstance. But communism, as the ultimate goal and idea of Satan's absolute control over humanity, is the consummate product of the Revolution, which expands on its own to take over, like a cancer takes over all kinds of tissues and organs, all kinds of societies where there are no longer any defenses against the disease. That is, where there is no trace of Christianity left.

That is why we believe that we must get to the bottom of this question: its theological concept, insofar as it concerns the war of the Blessed Virgin, as we can see from Genesis to Revelation, against the Serpent, that is, against Satan.

When studying the framework of the Revolution throughout the centuries, the mark of the serpent can be seen in the characters and groups behind the scenes, “behind the curtain.” The “ errors of Russia” (at that time) are today the errors of the entire West. They appear less brutal and milder, but for that very reason more insidious and lethal.

And when we say the West, we also include the Vatican, which is part of it, without the slightest resistance to the attribution of such mistakes, for it was in its own “October Revolution,” the Second Vatican Council, that the contagion took over the most important part of the body: the head.

Anti-Christian and naturalistic Jewish messianism, financed by internationalist bankers, implemented by Masonic lodges, in accordance with the Antichrist's world government: these are the errors that were first implemented through the Bolshevik Revolution and then, in a different way, became established in the West.

Naturalism lies behind both socialism and liberalism, behind the Jew Karl Marx and the Protestant John Stuart Mill. It ignores both God's sovereign dominion over His creatures and the necessary consequences of Christ's Incarnation, just as it denies the state of original sin. Grace is unnecessary because, by different means, the final goal is reached: the exaltation of man, which will be nothing other than that of the Antichrist. The obstacle is Catholicism.

Catholics clearly identified the enemy before the disastrous Second Vatican Council:

"Naturalism [...] is the affirmation of the autonomy and self-sufficiency of human nature [...] Satan was the first naturalist (affirming the autonomy and self-sufficiency of angelic nature) [...] In opposition to the supernatural kingdom of Christ, Satan establishes his naturalistic (or anti-supernatural) kingdom and seeks to extend it through two visible organizations: on the one hand, the Jewish nation, as the promoter of an earthly and economic messianism, and on the other hand, Freemasonry" (Civiltà Cattolica, March 1, 1947).

It is well known that Judeo-Freemasonry was behind the Communist Revolution. Juan Vázquez de Mella put it very well:

"Judaism, with the prodigious cunning of the race and the hatred of the Church, which it providentially demonstrates, like an ever-living prophecy, with its existence, now professes a ‘messianism’ that has nothing to do with the old one. It is not the sovereign conqueror who was to subject all peoples to Israel, nor the God-Man who was crucified, and whose divinity is demonstrated by the ruin of the temple, the destruction of the priesthood, and the dispersion, almost two millennia old, but a collective Messiah, which is the Jewish people themselves, who have, according to its great rabbis, the mission of converting all peoples into a fiefdom, particularly Christians, who have no hope left but to be their slaves and instruments.

And the program is carried out in two ways: through intellectual domination and through economic domination. All revolutionary ideas were born or developed in the synagogue and through the lodge. Modern pantheism comes from Spinoza; skeptical phenomenology from David Hume; and positivism took shape in Feuerbach and Littré. Collectivism with scientific appearances was formulated by two Jews: Karl Marx and Ferdinand Lassalle. Even constitutional liberalism, which was the political right of a skeptical bourgeoisie, was systematized by a Swiss Jew, Benjamin Constant. Economic individualism also had this Semitic origin in its founders.

Alongside intellectual domination, economic domination grew through banking, which was led by the Rothschilds and still has its main levers in Jewish hands. Alongside this plutocratic domination, they fostered demagoguery. On the one hand, they multiplied with loans and subjected states to their domination. On the other, they ruined anti-Jewish capital and rose up against that of the workers, who believed they were destroying one tyrant when they were actually bringing another, stronger one upon themselves.

The Bolshevik movement has Jewish origins, momentum, and leadership. Lenin and Trotsky are Jews, as were Rosa Luxemburg and her comrades in Germany, and so were the main revolutionary agents in Austria and Hungary.

(Juan Vázquez de Mella, EL PENSAMIENTO ESPAÑOL, December 27, 1919).

That program is being carried out before our very eyes. The Minutes of the First International Anti-Masonic Congress declare the following:

1. That Freemasonry is a religious and Manichean sect: that the ultimate secret and mystery is the worship of Lucifer or Satan, adored in the three lodges as the Good God, as opposed to the God of Catholics, whom the blasphemous initiates call the Evil God.

2. That the devil, the inspirer of Masonic sects, knowing that he will never be directly worshipped by the majority of men, seeks to infiltrate souls, through Freemasonry, with the seed of naturalism, which is nothing other than the complete emancipation of man from God.

3. That in order to implant this impious naturalism in the world, Freemasonry strives to accustom men to placing all religions on the same footing of equality, the one true religion and the false ones; it replaced the Catholic atmosphere with the Masonic atmosphere, through the press and godless schools.

4. That the particular means used by Freemasonry to lose souls eager for the supernatural, but not sufficiently prepared for Luciferian Manichaeism, is to excite them to indulge in the perverse practices of spiritualism.

5. That Freemasonry is also a political sect, which seeks to take over all governments, to make them blind instruments of its perverse action, and which also seeks to sow rebellion everywhere.

6. That the object of Freemasonry, sowing revolution throughout all corners of the globe, is the establishment of a Universal Republic, based on rebellion against divine sovereignty, on the destruction of local freedoms and franchises, on the abolition of borders and the perversion of patriotic sentiment, a sentiment which, after the love of God, has inspired mankind to its most beautiful actions, its most noble sacrifices, its most heroic self-denial.

7. That Freemasonry continues its struggle against the Church by introducing anti-Christian legislation into Christian countries.

8. That Freemasonry is directly responsible for modern socialism, because it has replaced the Christian ideal of social happiness with its own ideal; the Christian social hierarchy, governed by justice and tempered by charity, with a supposed equality of all men among themselves; because by making men forget that it is in the future life that each will be rewarded according to his works, it teaches them that happiness is found only in the material enjoyments of this world and that all have a strict right to an equal share of that happiness.

9. That Masonic philanthropy, as opposed to Christian charity, being, as it is, the purely natural love of some men for other men, is incapable of serving as a link between humanity and God; and that, moreover, this Masonic philanthropy is exercised only with regard to Masons themselves, and very often to the detriment of civil society.

10. That in order to irreparably corrupt the family, Freemasonry seeks to corrupt women, not only by admitting them into its lodges whenever possible, but also by being the driving force behind the so-called feminist or women's liberation movement, which is designed to introduce disruption and disorder into families through a vague desire for a completely unattainable reform.

11. That in order to accustom men to dispense with the Church in social life, the sect seeks to suppress religious holidays and days consecrated to the sanctification of souls and the resting of bodies, replacing them with purely civil holidays.

(Proceedings of the 1st International Anti-Masonic Congress, vol. I, pp. 333-38, in History of the Antichrist, by Alberto Ezcurra Medrano).

It is interesting to note how a date that repeats itself in history allows us to paint a picture of this absolute war (today they would call it global) between Christ and Belial, or between the lineage of the Woman and that of the serpent. And this takes place in the context of a war on a mega level, as it always concerns the great world empires and the small Catholic Church, universal in its scope and power, but at the same time, due to its earthly and political strength, very little influential before the powers of Caesar.

We note some facts and add related dates of great importance (for more details, we suggest reading our book Agenda Fatima II):

June 13, 323 BC: according to some historians, this date marks the death of Alexander the Great, which was the FALL OF THE GREATEST EMPIRE IN THE WORLD.

June 13, 313: Edict of Milan. CHRISTIAN VICTORY OVER THE GREATEST EMPIRE IN THE WORLD.

June 13, 1912: Pope St. Pius X recommends devotion on the first Saturday of the month in honor of the Blessed Virgin. A FORETASTE OF THE DEVOTION TO THE IMMACULATE HEART THAT WILL SAVE THE WORLD.

June 13, 1917: Second apparition of the Blessed Virgin in Fatima: “Jesus wants to ESTABLISH IN THE WORLD DEVOTION TO MY IMMACULATE HEART.”

December 10, 1925: Our Lady appears to Sister Lucia and reveals to her the DEVOTION OF THE FIRST FIVE SATURDAYS OF THE MONTH TO HER IMMACULATE HEART, which will bring peace to the world.

December 11, 1925: Pius XI publishes the encyclical Quas primas establishing the feast of CHRIST THE KING, not only of individuals but also OF THE NATIONS OF THE WHOLE WORLD. It is inevitable to link the triumph of the Immaculate Heart to the triumph of the Sacred Heart of Christ the King.

June 13, 1929: The Blessed Virgin ASKS FOR THE CONSECRATION OF RUSSIA, THE GREATEST EMPIRE IN THE WORLD (dominated by Jews) to her IMMACULATE HEART. Is the conversion of Russia linked to the conversion of the Jews?

June 13, 1944: The first cruise missile in history is launched over England, and its use by Germany marked the beginning of the use of unmanned automatic weapons to attack long-range targets during the GREATEST WORLD WAR IN HISTORY, which was won by the Judeo-Masonic Allied forces. The “errors of Russia” were to spread even further.

June 13, 1960: Meeting in the Vatican between Jules Isaac and John XXIII: THE CHANGE BEGINS in the Church that SPIRITUALLY DOMINATES THE WORLD, by the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN THAT DOMINATES THE EMPIRES OF THE WORLD. The Jews within the Church. The “errors of Russia” will corrupt the Church from within.

October 29, 1963: The Second Vatican Council refused to dedicate a separate document to the Virgin Mary. For ecumenical purposes, to please the Protestants, but WITH THE SERPENT BEHIND THEM INSPIRING THE CONCILIAR FATHERS TO DIMINISH THE ROLE OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN IN THE CHURCH. The “errors of Russia” would be consolidated from then on.

April 13, 1965: The new normative Mass is prayed for the first time in Rome, a monstrosity that will give rise to the Novus Ordo Missae in 1969. THE SERPENT FEARS THE HOLY SACRIFICE OF THE MASS, hence the move by modernist hierarchs to replace it with a form of worship acceptable to Protestants and Jews.

April 13, 1986: JOHN PAUL II BECOMES THE FIRST POPE TO VISIT A SYNAGOGUE. There he referred to Jews as “our elder brothers in faith” — a phrase that became famous and marked a change in relations between the Church and Judaism after the Second Vatican Council and its declaration Nostra Aetate (1965). This was a new affront to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, for the Virgin pointed to devotion and the recitation of the Holy Rosary as remedies against sin and war, not ecumenism and interreligious dialogue with the bearers of “the errors of Russia.”

October 16, 2002: John Paul II signed the apostolic letter Rosarium Virginis Mariæ. This letter, which aims to promote the Rosary, is imbued with naturalism from beginning to end. It considers the Rosary to be a psychological experience similar to the prayers and meditations of non-Catholic religions. Among the “improvements” to the Rosary proposed in this spirit is the addition of the “LUMINOUS MYSTERIES.” THESE WERE EXPRESSLY CHOSEN WITH AN ECUMENICAL MEANING, SO AS NOT TO OFFEND PROTESTANTS; that is, they are entirely described in the Gospels and none of them explicitly mention the Blessed Virgin. This fits perfectly with the pope's stated intention to make the rosary more “Christocentric,” which in practice means that it BECOMES LESS EXPLICITLY MARIAN.[3]

June 13, 2012: That day was set for the finalization of the agreement-capitulation of the FSSPX, led by liberals, with modernist Rome. A personal prelature had been proposed to it, and Bishop Fellay had traveled to the Vatican to sign that agreement. Internal Lefebvrist resistance alarmed the Vatican, and the agreement was cut short. The SSPX is THE LARGEST TRADITIONALIST CONGREGATION IN THE WORLD, so it is necessary to subdue it. Its downfall began with a trap involving the Jews. The result: Pope Benedict XVI reaffirmed Rome's adherence to Talmudic Judaism, and the SSPX “cleaned up” and never spoke of that controversial issue again.

June 13, 2013: Vladimir Putin publicly stated that THE MAJORITY OF THE REVOLUTIONARY COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT OF RUSSIA, that is, THE GREATEST EMPIRE IN THE WORLD, WAS COMPOSED OF JEWS.

June 13, 2019: The UN and the World Economic Forum sign a Memorandum of Understanding on a strategic partnership between the two international organizations to JOINTLY ACCELERATE THE SATANIC AGENDA 2030. Six months later, the Covid-19 “pandemic” emerges, PARALYZING THE ENTIRE WORLD AND CLOSING CHURCHES.

October 7, 2023: On the feast of Our Lady of the Rosary, Queen of Peace, Israel's devastating war—or rather genocide—against Gaza begins. Messianic goal to expand into “Greater Israel”: “Russia's mistakes” consolidated.

June 13, 2024: The Vatican publishes the revolutionary document called "The Bishop of Rome. Primacy and Synodality in Ecumenical Dialogues and Responses to the Encyclical Ut unum sint,“ aimed at REFORMULATING THE PAPACY, since it considers this to be a problem for unity with other Christians (heretics and schismatics). It is the ”self-demolition" of the Church.

June 13, 2025: Two events occur on this same day. On the one hand, ISRAEL LAUNCHES AN ATTACK AGAINST IRAN. Its prime minister, the genocidal Benjamin Netanyahu, states: “A few moments ago, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, a military operation aimed at dismantling the Iranian threat to Israel's survival. This operation will continue as long as necessary to eliminate this danger.” While this was happening abroad, Tel Aviv was celebrating its TEL AVIV PRIDE PARADE, one of the biggest events of the year and one of the largest LGBTQ parades in the Middle East. It is the LARGEST GAY PRIDE PARADE IN THE COUNTRY AND THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST. Tel Aviv municipal authorities estimated attendance at around 200,000–250,000 in 2025, making it the most attended mass public event in Israel this year.

This is also related to the Jewish-Communist Bolshevik revolution. The Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 not only transformed Russian politics and economics, but also had a profound impact on morality, family life, and sexuality. In its early years, the revolutionary leaders attempted to apply to the realm of customs the same principle of breaking with “bourgeois oppression” that they had proclaimed in the economic and political spheres. Between 1917 and 1920, the following revolutionary measures were taken: 1. Legalization of divorce: it was made much easier, requiring only the simple will of one of the parties. 2. Abolition of laws against homosexuality (in 1917-1918): Russia became one of the first countries to decriminalize it. 3.-Legalization of abortion in 1920, with the USSR being the first country in the world to do so. 4.-Promotion of sexual licentiousness or free “love”: theorists such as Alexandra Kollontai defended the idea that sexual relations should be free from legal and economic constraints. All this remained in place until Stalin's reaction in the 1930s, when he clearly saw that these measures were leading the country into chaos and dissolution.

Finally:

October 7, 2025: Leo XIV signs the doctrinal note Mater Populi fidelis of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which is made public on November 4, where, going against the teaching of Tradition and the Magisterium of the Church, THE TITLE OF CO-REDEMPTRIX AND MEDIATRIX OF ALL GRACES OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY IS REJECTED. If until now the Virgin Mary had been displaced in the consideration of the conciliar hierarchs, this time She is directly rejected, she is “ignored.” Objective: to diminish popular piety toward the Virgin, to remove an obstacle (yes, the Virgin is an obstacle) to unity in error with false religions. Not enough attention has been paid to what Leo XIV said during the celebration of the 60th anniversary of Nostra Aetate and the meeting for peace at the offensive interreligious gathering at the Roman Colosseum on October 28: “ALL RELIGIONS ARE MOTHERS.” If all religions are mothers, then the Catholic religion is not the only one that has a Mother, or Mary is not the only Mother. She can no longer be so, since Jesus Christ is not the only way of salvation for these Vatican apostates. There are many mothers, and Mary is just one more, she is only the “Mother of the faithful people.” Hence, they do not want to call her Co-Redemptrix or Mediatrix of all graces.

In short: the Synagogue of Satan, which seeks to move the world at will, inoculates it and the Church with the virus of naturalism, which then brings the errors of pantheism, atheism, and materialism.[4] With this naturalism come consequences in moral behavior: divorce, abortion, sexual licentiousness, and sodomy, the end of private property (which remains in the hands of a tiny, powerful elite that controls the issuance of money, the media, and natural resources), social control through “health emergencies,” and, of course, religious persecution of Christians (with or without bloodshed) who do not accept this state of affairs. And out of fear of this rejection or human respect, the hierarchy and members of the Church gradually accepted all these errors and immoral consequences. Divorced and remarried? Go ahead, says Pope Francis, you can receive Communion, with discernment [5]; abortion? There are many promoters of abortion among bishops and priests, and the bishops of the United States finance an organization that promotes abortion [6] (and previously approved a version of the Bible that whitewashes the sin of sodomy); Sodomy and sexual perversion? They are the order of the day. Homosexual couples are blessed, and even an LGBTQ group paraded freely inside St. Peter's Basilica during the Holy Jubilee. Agenda 2030, the “climate change” agenda, and the global elite are supported, promoted, and “shepherded” by the popes and hierarchs of Rome. Atheism is not directly promoted, but when Leo XIV—following all the conciliar popes—places all religions on an equal footing and affirms with a smile that “being a synodal Church means recognizing that truth is not possessed, but sought together, allowing ourselves to be guided by a restless heart in love with Love,” and that "no one possesses the whole truth; we must all seek it humbly and seek it together“ [7] and ”Let us commit ourselves to building a Church that is totally synodal, ministerial, and attracted to Christ and, therefore, committed to serving the world," he is clearly implicitly promoting religious indifference, total subjectivism, agnosticism, and ultimately atheism. But if the synodal church is a Teilhardian-pantheistic church, then that meeting of all religions—under the Noahide umbrella fabricated by the Jews—is much more feasible: they have eliminated that which separated them, the Truth. There is no truth and there is no error, there is dialogue and constant searching, in order to walk together toward pantheistic unity, what Bergoglio called a “polyhedron.”

Thus, what the conciliar-synodal Church is doing is denying the necessity of grace and therefore of the Catholic Church, of Christ's sacrifice, of Christ himself as Redeemer, and therefore of Mary as Co-Redemptrix.

It is true that the Leo-Tucho-ist document refers more than once to Christ as the only Mediator and Redeemer:

"The text, while clarifying in what sense certain titles and expressions referring to Mary are acceptable or not, aims to deepen the proper foundations of Marian devotion by specifying Mary's place in her relationship with believers, in light of the Mystery of Christ as the only Mediator and Redeemer. This implies a profound fidelity to Catholic identity and, at the same time, a particular ecumenical effort."

But, according to what Leo XIV says in his statements, that truth is not possessed, and that it must be sought with other religious sects, what the document says, would it be true or not? It is not, because modernists are not only subjectivists, but they no longer understand redemption in the good Catholic sense of rescuing sinners from the clutches of the devil through the expiatory and propitiatory sacrifice of Christ so that, having regained grace, they may thus enter heaven. For these heretics, redemption or salvation is an awareness that every man is identified with Jesus, simply because he is a man. The Second Vatican Council laid the foundations for a new religion intended primarily to exalt the human person and to bring about the unity of the human race. In this plan, the Mother of God reminds us, because she is the Immaculate Conception, that we are all sinners. This is an intolerable hindrance to the world. Her co-redemption, therefore, linked as it is to the mediation of all graces, reminds us precisely that we need grace to save ourselves. This is another thing that is very annoying to proud man. Therefore, the Blessed Virgin should be made only a disciple who walks behind Jesus of Nazareth: Mary of Nazareth. If Bergoglio were alive, he would call her the “little mother of tango.” Every religion is a mother, says Leo, and we have the “little mother” who accompanies us, but let us not exaggerate her titles and attributes. Buddhists, Jews, Hindus, and other “religions” can do just fine without Mary. This is the “particular ecumenical effort” that Tucho's document mentions and seeks to apply, which is incompatible with what it says earlier in the same sentence: “This implies a profound fidelity to Catholic identity.” An obvious lie from the prefect cardinal, an erotomaniac expert in healing by applying tender kisses.

As Father Nitoglia explains in an article on this blog, there is a triple Marian prerogative: "Mary is Co-Redemptrix, because she cooperated in the acquisition of grace; she is Mediatrix, because she cooperates in its distribution; she is universal Dispensatrix, because she effectively administers all God's gifts to souls. To deny any of these prerogatives is to mutilate the divine plan of Redemption. For this reason, the Magisterium, Tradition, and theological reason agree in affirming that Co-redemption and universal Mediation constitute the two complementary aspects of the one Marian mission in the order of grace."

In short, Mary is expelled from God's plan of salvation because she is no longer necessary and she is dangerous because she is the one who crushes the serpent under her foot. Popular devotion to the Blessed Virgin must be diluted into a sentimental fondness. Striking at doctrine means spoiling prayer, which loses all its effectiveness. The mortal blow against the Mass is now repeated against the Immaculate Conception. 

Ipsa conteret

 Thus, in this absolute battle between the Church of Christ and the Synagogue of Satan, between the Immaculate One and the Serpent, Our Lady pointed out the errors to be fought and the way to overcome them. But, unfortunately, the hierarchs of the Church have ignored, betrayed, or insulted her, as has just happened now. These vile people are incapable of realizing that the Blessed Virgin cannot be disrespected with impunity, because her Son is very jealous of his Mother.

The minions, henchmen, and accomplices of Satan's Synagogue are accelerating their task of demolishing the Church from within, while Jewish messianism is accelerating what will be the process of its defeat by provoking catastrophic wars around Israel. Both fronts must be resolved by punishment for not having wanted to use the last remedies that God had given to the world. Time seems to have run out, and an evil cycle is coming to an end, one that will have lasted 70 years within the Church in 2029, just as the captivity of the Church in Avignon lasted 70 years, Soviet communism lasted 70 years, and the captivity of the Jews in Babylon lasted 70 years. The seventh pope of this ignominious cycle is unwittingly hastening the early end of this cycle. We do not believe it will end the way Eliot imagined it exactly 100 years ago in “The Hollow Men”: “This is how the world ends, not with a bang but with a whimper.” It will be much more spectacular than that.

Assured triumph

One fact strikes us as noteworthy: "In 1920, Pope Benedict XV established three theological commissions (one Roman, one Belgian, and one Spanish) to study the question, and on December 21, 1921, he granted the Feast of Mary Mediatrix of All Graces, to be celebrated on May 31 throughout the universal Church, at the end of the month of Mary. This feast was replaced by the Feast of Mary Queen of the World, instituted by Pius XII on October 11, 1954 [a very unfortunate event; curiously, the date of the change in the Mass was the same as the date on which the disastrous Vatican II was to begin]; however, in the Masses pro aliquibus locis, the Mass of Mary Mediatrix of All Graces remains, which can be celebrated on May 8.

Well, May 8 is the date of election of this pope, who now repudiates that Marian title, thus stalking Mary's heel.

However, it has already been said: “Ipsa conteret caput tuum” (“She will crush your head,” Gen. III, 15). The enemy will be defeated, and very soon. Our Lady, the Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix, assured us: “In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph.”

NOTAS:

[1] The title of the Virgin as “Mother of the Church” met with considerable resistance at the last Council. But that now seems to be too much, and just as the Church became the “People of God,” so now, demagogically, the Virgin is being made, through sentimental language, the “Mother of the Faithful People.” Leftists, progressives, and democrats love to abuse the word “people” to deceive the true “People of God,” whom they have no problem calling the Virgin Mary Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix. It goes without saying that this new title is consistent with the new “synodal Church” that is being formed on the ruins of the traditional Church.

But the content of this deplorable document is not new. Already at the 12th International Mariological Congress in Poland in 1997, when studying the possibility of defining the Marian titles of Mediatrix, Co-Redemptrix, and Advocate, and after several working meetings, the Commission published a statement making the following assertions:

“The proposed titles—Co-redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate—are ambiguous, as they can be understood in different ways. We also believe that it is not appropriate to abandon the theological line followed by the Second Vatican Council, which did not wish to define any of them: it did not use the title Co-redemptrix in its teaching, and it made very sparing use of the titles Mediatrix and Advocate (Lumen Gentium 62). Even if these titles were attributed with meanings that would allow them to be accepted as part of the deposit of faith, their definition, in the current situation, would not, however, be theologically appropriate, inasmuch as these titles and the doctrines inherent in them still need further study and a renewed Trinitarian, ecclesiological, and anthropological perspective. Finally, theologians, especially non-Catholics, have been sensitive to the ecumenical difficulties that a definition of the above titles would entail.” (Osservatore Romano, June 4, 1997).

[2] https://agendafatima.blogspot.com/2025/11/maria-corredentora.html

https://agendafatima.blogspot.com/2025/11/fremet-et-tabescet-proposito-de-la.html

https://www.infocatolica.com/blog/praeclara.php/2511050933-leyendo-mater-populi-fidelis

https://www.infocatolica.com/blog/praeclara.php/2511080605-title

https://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com/2025/11/mons-schneider-reacciona-ante-la.html

https://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com/2025/11/mater-populi-fidelis-contra-el.html

[3] “The result of this change in orientation is that the attention of the faithful is gradually being diverted from redemption, conceived as the rescue of sinners' souls, as the price of sin that had to be paid, the satisfaction for the offense committed against God. The new theology called “the Paschal Mystery” considers that this is not necessary, that God is not so childish as to demand payment of a ransom for sins and, therefore, that it is enough to meditate on the manifestation of God's love, his glory, or his mercy.

For “each of these mysteries is a revelation of the Kingdom already present in the person of Jesus” (Rosarium Virginis Mariae, § 21). The consequence of reciting these luminous mysteries is the withering of the rosary, the loss of its explicit Marian character, and the diversion of our attention from union with Christ's redemptive act, the act that alone can save us from our sins. Little by little, the rosary will become empty and sterile, and will cease to be recited.

https://agendafatima.blogspot.com/2025/11/deben-rezarse-los-misterios-luminosos.html

[4] Cf. Cardenal Pie, El orden sobrenatural, Ed. Iction, 1981, p. 111 y ss.

From Néstor Martínez's analysis, we find these paragraphs relevant to the Vatican document:

"Paradoxically, eliminating created grace and leaving only the Trinitarian indwelling is to eliminate all real contact between God and men, or rather, to identify God with men in a pantheistic way.

“ Instead, Mater populi fidelis says: “Created grace, then, does not act as an ‘intermediary,’ but is a direct effect of the friendship that God grants by touching the human heart directly. And so, since it is God who brings about the transformation of the person when he gives himself as a friend, there is no intermediary between God and the transformed human being. Only God is capable of penetrating so deeply to sanctify, to the point of becoming absolutely immediate, and only He can do so without annulling the person."

We would add, going beyond the document itself: modernists not only turn dogmas into symbols, but also sacraments, emptying them of meaning. God can act directly, ergo the Church and the sacraments become unnecessary in themselves, and are rather an outward manifestation of belonging. And the pantheism is clear in the course of the unity of all religions, because man has infinite dignity, which goes hand in hand with the condemnation of the death penalty, etc.

If, as Fr. Calderón teaches, the religion of Vatican II is Christian humanism, then human beings are divine, because that is what religion focuses on: a divine being. Therefore, there is no need for a “Mediatrix of all graces” or a “Co-redemptrix,” besides the fact that these are purely Catholic expressions that separate us from our “separated brethren” and from all other religions. That is the reason for interreligious meetings: all men have a divine spark within them (Gnosticism – New Age), and redemption consists in helping them discover it.

The synodal church in the making is a pantheistic-Teilhardian church, which must rid itself of all Catholic remnants.

All this is already explained in Pascendi; the ultramodernists are putting into action what is denounced there (also in the Syllabus of Pius IX).

[5] Amoris Laetitia — Apostolic Exhortation of Pope Francis (2016)

[6]https://infovaticana.com/2025/11/12/los-obispos-de-estados-unidos-f...

[7] Leo XIV teaches the opposite of what his predecessor Leo XIII taught in his Encyclical Divinum illud munus written in 1897: "Thus was fulfilled Christ's final promise to his apostles to send the Holy Spirit, who was to complete and, so to speak, seal the deposit of doctrine entrusted to them under his inspiration. 'I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear it now; but when the Spirit of truth comes, he will teach you all truth' (Jn 16:12-13). For He, who is the Spirit of truth, since He proceeds both from the Father, who is eternal Truth, and from the Son, who is substantial Truth, receives from each one both His essence and the fullness of all truth. He communicates this truth to his Church, protecting her with his almighty help so that she never falls into error, and helping her to foster more and more each day the seeds of divine doctrine and to make them fruitful for the well-being of peoples."

 

[bernadette szczepkowski]

Wow!

[Michael]

Superb.

[Joseph]

Excellent. Thank you for posting.