Viganò’s Declaration on the Canonical Sanctions Imposed on Father Frank A. Pavone

Thursday, December 22, 2022

Viganò’s Declaration on the Canonical Sanctions Imposed on Father Frank A. Pavone

Written by 
Viganò’s Declaration on the Canonical Sanctions Imposed on Father Frank A. Pavone

Vigano crest 2Agere sequitur esse. So we are taught by scholastic philosophy: the action of every being depends on the nature of that being. It follows that a person’s actions are consistent with who that person is. We find confirmation of this principle of ontology in the canonical sanctions recently imposed by the Holy See on Father Frank A. Pavone, a well-known and appreciated pro-life priest, who for decades has been committed to the battle against the horrible crime of abortion. If a Roman Dicastery decides to electrocute a priest with reduction to the lay state, accusing him of blasphemy and preventing him from having the ability to defend himself legally in a canonical trial; and if, at the same time, analogous decisions are not taken with regard to notorious heretical, corrupt, and fornicating clergy, it is not out of place to ask if such a persecutory action reveals a persecutory mind, and if an action against a good priest who has worked strenuously to oppose abortion reveals the hatred of the persecutor with regard to the Good and those who fight for it. This unjust and illegitimate punishment becomes all the more hateful the closer we come to Holy Christmas, if we consider that by the killing of innocent children the Enemy of the human race wants to kill the Infant King.

The Bergoglian sect eclipses the Catholic Church with its arrogant occupation of leadership posts and scandalously abuses its authority for a purpose opposed to that for which Our Lord, the Head of the Church, has intended it. There is no area of doctrine, morals, discipline, or liturgy that has not been the object of its vandalizing action. Nothing is being saved of the little that remained after sixty years of systematic demolition through the work of Second Vatican Council, and that which survives as a crumbling reminder of the glories of days gone by is under the constant threat of new and worse devastation.

If serving the Church and defending the life of innocent creatures in this time of apostasy constitutes a crime worthy of dismissal from the clerical state, while promoting abortion and gender ideology and violating consecrated virgins is not deemed liable to excommunication, then Father Pavone ought to consider this shameful Vatican decision to be a source of pride.

It is therefore evident that the Roman Sanhedrin – whose work baffles even the most cautious interpreters of Vatican affairs – has a purpose of persecuting the good and promoting evildoers. The case of the “cancellation” of Father Pavone is the umpteenth demonstration that this purpose is being carried out with ferocious obstinacy, both in order to feed a climate of terror among the clergy so as to constrain them into servile and fearful obedience and also to create disorientation and scandal among the faithful and others who still look to the Church as a moral point of reference. All of this is happening at the same time that the Jesuit priest Marko Ivan Rupnik, on whom a sentence is pending for very serious canonical crimes that carry with them the punishment of excommunication latæ sententiæ, has his canonical penalty remitted by his Jesuit confrere and companion who lives in Santa Marta; and while the Roman Curia is infested with unpresentable characters who are notoriously corrupt and heretical sodomites and fornicators. Bergoglian acolytes are distinguished in this manner: the graver their crimes, the more prestigious the positions they hold.

In the face of this violation of the most elementary principles of justice and governmental prudence, as well as the blatant determination of the highest levels of the Hierarchy to act contra mentem legis, it is necessary that the Cardinals and Bishops understand the very serious consequences of their complicit silence, and that they courageously raise their voices in defense of the healthy part of the ecclesial body. This duty is imposed by respect for the Catholic Truth which has been violated, the honor of Holy Mother Church who has been humiliated by her own Prelates, and the eternal salvation of souls which has been endangered by the words and action of evil shepherds who are usurping an authority that does not belong to them but rather to Christ the King and High Priest, the Head of the Mystical Body.

If serving the Church and defending the life of innocent creatures in this time of apostasy constitutes a crime worthy of dismissal from the clerical state, while promoting abortion and gender ideology and violating consecrated virgins is not deemed liable to excommunication, then Father Pavone ought to consider this shameful Vatican decision to be a source of pride, recalling Our Savior’s words: Blessed are you when they insult you and persecute you and utter every manner of evil against you falsely because of Me (Mt 5:11). And whoever has inculpated themselves as an accomplice of this persecution against the good ought to tremble at the thought of the judgement which awaits them. Deus non irridetur – God is not mocked (Gal 6:7).

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop
December 22, 2022

Views: 61

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The same source of pride the SSPX should have had concerning the illegal, wrong, shameful and deceitful "excommunications".  May Fr Pavone wear it as a badge of honor and not see it as a yolk to be cast off.

I asked Bp. Fellay once why he did a "crusade" for the lifting of the excommunications.  He said "It is a matter of justice".  Yes, and no. It is unjust, but an unjust mark by the enemies of Christ.  Do the enemies of Christ meet out justice under such a circumstance or can they add to our burden by such an act?  No.  Not if we understand that such a flogging by God's enemies is a mark of His approval upon the road we have taken.  If we truly understood that we would not be so quick to desire it be removed.  Asking that it be removed gives a tacit implication that the acts of these usurpers and infiltrators have some validity...they do not.

Dawn Marie, I am in entire agreement with your sentiments. ABp. Lefebvre considered his excommunication as a badge of honor. I did not sing the Ta Deum when this was withdrawn 

from the four Bishops and I felt insulted for ABp Lefebvreand Bp. de Castro Meyer, whose excommunication survives. Again read my second sentence. I now refer to them as the neo-SSPX.

Watch or listen to Fr. Hewko's sermons. You will hear the Truth of our world situation.

Oh I do more than listen to Fr. Hewko.  He is our missionary priest who brings us the Sacraments.  A saint if there ever was one...or at least one in the making :)

Are you in Canada?  If so hopefully Father made it up to you guys since priests have finally been allowed back in Canada. 

David Gordon Paul LePage said:

Dawn Marie, I am in entire agreement with your sentiments. ABp. Lefebvre considered his excommunication as a badge of honor. I did not sing the Ta Deum when this was withdrawn 

from the four Bishops and I felt insulted for ABp Lefebvreand Bp. de Castro Meyer, whose excommunication survives. Again read my second sentence. I now refer to them as the neo-SSPX.

Watch or listen to Fr. Hewko's sermons. You will hear the Truth of our world situation.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2024   Created by Dawn Marie.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service