Don't know how long this will be up on YouTube; they're begun the process of scrubbing the Archbishop from YouTube. Anyway, this is a very important message, just posted yesterday. He describes the situation in the Church very clearly, pulling no punches, and then he calls for the Consecrations of Individuals, families, and communities to the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peOdRlylRnE
Also, here is a very important message from a few days ago, from the Archbishop, about the vaccine, in which he calls taking the injection a form of satanic baptism:
https://rumble.com/vmsuj7-the-vigan-tapes-10-decades-of-systematic-...
Tags:
Views: 71
I am, in fact, much more wary of Alexis Bugnolo that of Cdl. Viganò. His article in no way establishes the presence of Hegelian dialectic or dualism (thesis, antithesis, synthesis: 2 + 2 = 4, no, 2 + 2 = 5, okay let's compromise, 2 + 2 = 4 1/2) in anything the abp. has said or done, and makes numerous claims without proving them. Plus, he may not be a brother, as he calls himself -- there apparently is strong evidence that he is not -- and there are a lot of disturbing claims about him. Some or all may be disinformation; it's very difficult to know. Also, while he has in the past mentioned Fatima and the consecration, it is not a primary talking point with him, so I misspoke earlier when I said that he stressed it along with stressing that Benedict is still pope.
Similarly, the situation re Abp. Viganò is also one where possibly truth or possibly sophisticated disinformation is arrayed against him. I have been and will continue to pray for discernment, because the abp. is either one of our best friends or one of our worst enemies, and it would be a bad mistake to come to the wrong conclusion. So far, Alexis Bugnolo looks much sketchier to me than Abp. Viganò.
Sees through him? Wow. Who do you think you are -- God? Are you omniscient? And your proof is some people on Twitter who've jumped on the "Let's slam Viganò" bandwagon? I'm surprised at you, passing judgement without solid proof. If you said you had serious concerns but were reserving judgment until you had incontrovertible proof that would be one thing, but what you're doing is textbook rash judgement. I have concerns too, loads of them about all sorts of people in the Church, in politics, and elsewhere, but I make a real effort not to go off half-cocked.
© 2025 Created by Dawn Marie. Powered by