Fatima Crucial – II - His Excellency Bishop Richard Williamson

[Michael]

Fatima Crucial – II

Churchmen make war on Fatima – all in vain.
Satan will be defeated, once again.

Last week these “Comments” argued that if only Church and world had heeded Our Lady’s great message given through the three children of Fatima, Portugal, in 1917, then the world could have been spared the material disaster of World War II, and the Church might have avoided the much greater spiritual disaster of the Second Vatican Council. But in 1960, which was the year when, at the latest, Our Lady wished the third part of the Secret given to the children in 1917 to be revealed, instead the churchmen locked it away, most likely because it condemned in advance the disastrous Council on which their hearts were set. And ever since, the same Conciliar churchmen have made war on Fatima, to stop it from condemning them.

Yet faithful Catholics knew of the existence of the “Third Secret” and wanted to know what it said. Over the next 40 years a few details of its contents leaked out here and there, and, especially thanks to the labours of Fr Nicholas Gruner, pressure built up for its publication. That is why in 2000 the churchmen in Rome made a special effort to bury Fatima once and for all. As head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Ratzinger published a text which he claimed was the Third Secret of Fatima. Alas, Fatima experts immediately saw serious differences between the Cardinal’s text and what was known of the true Third Secret, awaited since 1960. They suspected that the true Third Secret was still locked away inside the Vatican.

What confirmed this suspicion was the fact that later in the same year 2000, the Cardinal himself told a personal friend (and a saintly priest), Dr Ingo Dollinger, that “What we published was not the whole Secret. We acted under orders.” Over the next many years, Dr Dollinger told the story of the Cardinal’s admission for many priests, seminarians and lay-folk to hear. Most recently, he confirmed the story once more, and gave permission for it to be published on May 16, 2016. But the truth about the Third Secret could not be allowed to get out. See onepeterfive.com/confirmation-father-dollingers-claim-cardinal-ratzinger-fatima. Within days (May 21), the Vatican released a Press Statement that quoted Benedict XVI, the former Cardinal Ratzinger, as saying that he had never spoken to Dr Dollinger about Fatima, and that the entire Third Secret had been made public! Obviously, Conciliar Rome will go to any lengths to stifle Fatima, but Fatima will not be stifled.

At onepeterfive.com/chief-exorcist-father-amorth-padre-pio-knew-the-third-secret on the Internet, see details of an interview given in 2011 by the famous exorcist of Rome (but no Conciliarist), Fr Gabriel Amorth, who wanted the interview to be made public only after his death – he died last year. Fr Amorth knew Padre Pio for 26 years, and the interviewer asked Fr Amorth if, in a conversation held with Padre Pio in about 1960, Padre Pio connected the Third Secret to the loss of faith in the Church. Padre Pio replied very sorrowfully: “You know, Gabriele?It is Satan who has been introduced into the bosom of the Church and within a very short time will come to rule a false Church.”

More recently still, it is the brave Cardinal Burke who is entering the fray on behalf of Our Lady of Fatima. He is one of the four Cardinals who earlier this year raised serious objections to the papal document, Amoris Laetitia, on marriage and family. On May 19 in Rome he appealed at a meeting of Roman Life Forum for Catholics to “work for the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.” He admitted that John-Paul II had made such a consecration of the world in 1984, but “once again we hear the call of Our Lady of Fatima to consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart, in accord with her explicit instruction.” The Cardinal is quite right. May he at least never be obliged to swallow his words!

Kyrie eleison.

Fatima Crucial – II - His Excellency Bishop Richard Williamson

[Michael]

Because there is no wiggle room.  The irony is that the modernists now always bring up the topic of obedience and yet they were anything but obedient.  They actively sought the destruction of the Church and its doctrine and worked for revolution.  Where was their obedience?  They swore false oaths to the Church  by paying lip service to the Oath Against Modernism and yet worked in the shadows all the time for modernism.  They are full of hubris and openly declare that their change is a new magisterium, from a pastoral council that supposedly imposed no new doctrine.  They cannot say Si Si or No No, because it goes against their very nature.  For them it is let your words be, maybe..Kind of, sort of. 

[Flavia Talladen Schott]

I'm with you, Michael. We can not obey a pope who teaches against what the Church has always taught. 

"They are openly teaching against the teachings of Christ.  They embrace an arch heretic in Martin Luther.  It is folly to think you can convert them from inside. "

[Flavia Talladen Schott]

Acc. to some source, the modernists abolished the Oath Against Modernism.

https://forums.catholic.com/t/why-did-the-church-abolish-the-anti-m...

[Michael]

They did indeed.  Paul VI abolished it. The errors of Vatican II were glaring, it is also why there was a need for a new catechism and a new Canon Law, to justify and enshrine their error.  Bp Fellay has stated that 95% of VII is okay, but would you drink coffee or tea that is 5% poison.  Modernism is an aggressive cancer that will spread if given even a 5% hold.  Look at the fruits of VII...there are none.     

[Flavia Talladen Schott]

What I can't understand is that, while VC II  is a pastoral and an unbinding council, why do we have to embrace it to be considered in good standing?

Michael said:

They did indeed.  Paul VI abolished it. The errors of Vatican II were glaring, it is also why there was a need for a new catechism and a new Canon Law, to justify and enshrine their error.  Bp Fellay has stated that 95% of VII is okay, but would you drink coffee or tea that is 5% poison.  Modernism is an aggressive cancer that will spread if given even a 5% hold.  Look at the fruits of VII...there are none.     

[Michael]

Because the Paul VI promulgated the Novus Ordo as the ordinary Mass.  This was later emphasized by Benedict the XVI when he declared that the Novus Ordo the ordinary form and the Tridentine the extraordinary form of the Mass.  The Novus Ordo however is not a dogmatic rite of the Mass, whereas the Tridentine has been declared as dogmatic and infallible.  Go figure.

[Flavia Talladen Schott]

so far I see, ... thanks. 

[Michael]

I know it does not make sense.  It is disoriented.

[Flavia Talladen Schott]

Indeed. I mean, how can there be two forms of the highest veneration of the Almighty? This is a clear sign of division.

He wants the Church to be in unity as He and the Father are One; but we are far away from that goal. But I can't join in with those who intentionally violate Him and His teachings.

The question really as one friend has put it, is, is the Catholic Church of Vatican the Catholic Church? 

Michael said:

I know it does not make sense.  It is disoriented.

[Michael]

They are attempting to create a new Church in their image.  Whether it is adding mysteries to the Holy Rosary, given by Our Lady to Saint Dominic or Francis adding to the Beatitudes with his own additions  From Sweden, Francis proposes six new Beatitudes for the modern era.  This is the very height of hubris and a sign that something is very wrong.  How can one contemplate that they could add to and improve the very words of Our Savior for the modern era.  This is rubbish.  Our Lord's words are timeless and perfect.  Or Francis' tacit approval to a one world religious body administered by the UN.  United Religions Back in the Spotlight Pope Picked to Lead One-Worl....  This is madness.  Yet, we who desire to follow the faith as it was handed down are the ones accused of pride, arrogance, heresy.  This nonsense and disorientation is as old as the world itself.  This short story about Saint Dominic provides a way forward, St. Dominic and the Rosary.  Like the Albigenses, the modernists are on the surface well educated and degreed.  Saint Dominic understood that the faithful had to be equally well educated to combat this grave error.  If we look at modern RCIA it is often a joke of syncretistic belief and abject modernist secular thought.  It is a reflection of the Novius Ordo.  I feel it is incumbent for all of us to continue to educate ourselves about the Faith.  Perhaps in addition to being members of the Crusaders, to join true traditional Third Orders, like the Dominicans of Avrille, or traditional Carmelites, or Franciscans, to help prepare us even more.          

[David Kaftal]

I believe the words you are thinking of may be, "In a sense..."

Michael said:

They cannot say Si Si or No No, because it goes against their very nature.  For them it is let your words be, maybe..Kind of, sort of. 

[David Kaftal]

Because the reality of Vatican II is that it was a coup d'état by modernists, Communists, Freemasons, homosexuals and other enemies of Our Lord, overthrowing the legitimate Mass, Sacraments, and teachings of Holy Mother Church and replacing them with ambiguous hogwash and lethal time bombs and a counterfeit religion. However, here and there it still retains maybe 10% of real Catholicism. It's been a transitional Church for a while, but it's on the verge of becoming a completely heretical, schismatic 100% counterfeit Church. No longer a half-rotten apple, but a mass of nothing but stinking rot.

Flavia Talladen Schott said:

What I can't understand is that, while VC II  is a pastoral and an unbinding council, why do we have to embrace it to be considered in good standing?

Michael said:

They did indeed.  Paul VI abolished it. The errors of Vatican II were glaring, it is also why there was a need for a new catechism and a new Canon Law, to justify and enshrine their error.  Bp Fellay has stated that 95% of VII is okay, but would you drink coffee or tea that is 5% poison.  Modernism is an aggressive cancer that will spread if given even a 5% hold.  Look at the fruits of VII...there are none.