As many of you know, a certain bishop was excluded from the General Chapter, or meeting of heads of the Society of St Pius X, held last month in Econe, Switzerland. To confirm the exclusion, use was apparently made of the adaptation by “Eleison Comments” (#257, June 16) of St Paul’s seemingly murderous wish that the corruptors of the Catholic Faith be “cut off” (Galatians V, 12). Actually Ambrose, Jerome, Augustine and Chrysostom all think that the wish, in context (Gal.V, 1-12), is aimed at the Judaisers’ manhood rather than at their very lives, and Chrysostom thinks it is a jest.
However, when I heard what serious use was being made of the jest at the Chapter, I must admit that I had a naughty vision: I imagined my noble colleagues in SSPX headquarters looking out of the windows at night to see if there might not be a lanky episcopal Englishman, heavily disguised as Jack the Ripper, prowling around in the bushes with a long carving-knife gleaming in the moonlight, seeking someone to carve to pieces. Dear colleagues, sleep easy - I have no murderous ambitions. Honestly !
But the Chapter was serious business. What did it produce ? Above all, a Declaration, made public a few days later, and six conditions for any future Rome-SSPX agreement, leaked on the Internet soon after that (given how many souls are presently entrusting their faith and their salvation to the guidance of the SSPX, I find such a leak not unreasonable). Now all honour to the good men at the Chapter who by all accounts did their best to limit the damage, but if the Declaration and conditions give us the present mind of the Society’s leaders as a whole, then there has to be cause for concern.
As for the Declaration of 2012, it is enough to compare it for a few moments with Archbishop Lefebvre’s Declaration of 1974, to wonder what has happened to his Society. Whereas the Archbishop explicitly and repeatedly denounces the reformation wrought by Vatican II (“born of Liberalism and Modernism, poisoned through and through, deriving from heresy and ending in heresy”), in words that brought down upon him the wrath of the Conciliar Popes, on the contrary the Declaration of 2012 refers only once to the Council with its “novelties” merely “stained with errors”, in terms that one can easily imagine Benedict XVI underwriting from beginning to end. Does the SSPX now think that the Conciliar Popes represent no serious problem ?
As for the six conditions for any future Rome-SSPX agreement, they deserve a detailed examination, but suffice it to say here and now that the demand made by the SSPX’s 2006 General Chapter for a doctrinal agreement prior to any practical agreement seems to have gone completely by the board. Is it now the mind of the SSPX that the doctrine of the Romans to whom they would submit is no longer so important ? Or is the SSPX itself succumbing to the charms of Liberalism ?
For a contrarian point of view, may I venture to recommend a collection of “Sermons and Doctrinal Conferences” of His Excellency Jack the Ripper from between 1994 and 2009, now available on seven CD’s from http://truerestorationpress.com/node/52, with special incentives to purchase expiring at the end of this month ? Not every word in these 30 hours of recordings may be golden, some words are no doubt too temperamental, but at least the effort is made to disembowel the enemies and not the friends of our Catholic Faith.
Kyrie eleison.
Tags:
Views: 852
Exactly---which is why I believe somehow someway it can be resolved without them having to abandon ship.
At least Father Chazal has made it clear he will not leave. He says they have to make him go.
Pablo also said Fr Hewko was headed for New Zealand, which was never true. Fr. Chazal said that he was not leaving the SSPX as recent as in this past Sundays sermon.
I do wonder however in this sea of confusion if others have noticed how much has been accomplished by prayer in this crisis.
We need to pray for our bishops and priests more than anything.
The Lord God knows they are the first line of defense and the first to get slammed by satan, which of course includes temptations to all manner of things from pride-to despair.
Yes agreed a thousand percent.
A friend of mine whose sister (blood sister) was asked by ABL to be the first Mother Superior of the Sisters of the SSPX, Mother Mary Jude. ABL had come to the states to visit the family.
She said that ABL said, he did not believe that VatII would have happened if enough people had been praying for their priests (and bishops, cardinals et al).
Along those lines one might say that maybe this crisis in the SSPX might have been averted if more people were praying for their priests and bishops etc.
Along those same lines I still believe Mary can do something to stop a split. To stop any further damage which has already been done.
D, have you come across with this letter? In my opinion it might be relevant in regard to your comments about His Lordship Bp. Williamson:
Yes I've seen it.
Unfortunately there is always so much more to the story than meets the eye.
Personally I need to put my focus on Mary and her intentions and stop getting off track with all this stupid infighting.
I'm wasting my time on this earth paying attention or rather giving attention to all their bickering.
Thank you though for the letter Maria+ I appreciate it : )
God bless you always
Thank you D for the reply. As for myself is concerned, after reading that letter, I could say once more:
For gold and silver are tried in the fire, but acceptable men in the furnace of humiliation. Ecclesiasticus 2:5
God bless you always!!!
© 2025 Created by Dawn Marie.
Powered by