A CHAPTER

As many of you know, a certain bishop was excluded from the General Chapter, or meeting of heads of the Society of St Pius X, held last month in Econe, Switzerland. To confirm the exclusion, use was apparently made of the adaptation by “Eleison Comments” (#257, June 16) of St Paul’s seemingly murderous wish that the corruptors of the Catholic Faith be “cut off” (Galatians V, 12). Actually Ambrose, Jerome, Augustine and Chrysostom all think that the wish, in context (Gal.V, 1-12), is aimed at the Judaisers’ manhood rather than at their very lives, and Chrysostom thinks it is a jest.

However, when I heard what serious use was being made of the jest at the Chapter, I must admit that I had a naughty vision: I imagined my noble colleagues in SSPX headquarters looking out of the windows at night to see if there might not be a lanky episcopal Englishman, heavily disguised as Jack the Ripper, prowling around in the bushes with a long carving-knife gleaming in the moonlight, seeking someone to carve to pieces. Dear colleagues, sleep easy - I have no murderous ambitions. Honestly !

But the Chapter was serious business. What did it produce ? Above all, a Declaration, made public a few days later, and six conditions for any future Rome-SSPX agreement, leaked on the Internet soon after that (given how many souls are presently entrusting their faith and their salvation to the guidance of the SSPX, I find such a leak not unreasonable). Now all honour to the good men at the Chapter who by all accounts did their best to limit the damage, but if the Declaration and conditions give us the present mind of the Society’s leaders as a whole, then there has to be cause for concern.

As for the Declaration of 2012, it is enough to compare it for a few moments with Archbishop Lefebvre’s Declaration of 1974, to wonder what has happened to his Society. Whereas the Archbishop explicitly and repeatedly denounces the reformation wrought by Vatican II (“born of Liberalism and Modernism, poisoned through and through, deriving from heresy and ending in heresy”), in words that brought down upon him the wrath of the Conciliar Popes, on the contrary the Declaration of 2012 refers only once to the Council with its “novelties” merely “stained with errors”, in terms that one can easily imagine Benedict XVI underwriting from beginning to end. Does the SSPX now think that the Conciliar Popes represent no serious problem ?

As for the six conditions for any future Rome-SSPX agreement, they deserve a detailed examination, but suffice it to say here and now that the demand made by the SSPX’s 2006 General Chapter for a doctrinal agreement prior to any practical agreement seems to have gone completely by the board. Is it now the mind of the SSPX that the doctrine of the Romans to whom they would submit is no longer so important ? Or is the SSPX itself succumbing to the charms of Liberalism ?

For a contrarian point of view, may I venture to recommend a collection of “Sermons and Doctrinal Conferences” of His Excellency Jack the Ripper from between 1994 and 2009, now available on seven CD’s from http://truerestorationpress.com/node/52, with special incentives to purchase expiring at the end of this month ? Not every word in these 30 hours of recordings may be golden, some words are no doubt too temperamental, but at least the effort is made to disembowel the enemies and not the friends of our Catholic Faith.

Kyrie eleison.

Views: 852

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Exactly---which is why I believe somehow someway it can be resolved without them having to abandon ship.

At least Father Chazal has made it clear he will not leave.  He says they have to make him go.

Pablo also said Fr Hewko was headed for New Zealand, which was never true.  Fr. Chazal said that he was not leaving the SSPX as recent as in this past Sundays sermon.

I do wonder however in this sea of confusion if others have noticed how much has been accomplished by prayer in this crisis.

We need to pray for our bishops and priests more than anything.

The Lord God knows they are the first line of defense and the first to get slammed by satan, which of course includes temptations to all manner of things from pride-to despair.

Yes agreed a thousand percent.

A friend of mine whose sister (blood sister) was asked by ABL to be the first Mother Superior of the Sisters of the SSPX, Mother Mary Jude.  ABL had come to the states to visit the family.

She said that ABL said, he did not believe that VatII would have happened if enough people had been praying for their priests (and bishops, cardinals et al).

Along those lines one might say that maybe this crisis in the SSPX might have been averted if more people were praying for their priests and bishops etc.

Along those same lines I still believe Mary can do something to stop a split.  To stop any further damage which has already been done.

D, have you come across with this letter? In my opinion it might be relevant in regard to your comments about His Lordship Bp. Williamson:

(...) 7 de agosto de 2012

Text of Letter from Fr. Matthew Clifton, SSPX, to Fr. Christian Thouvenot, Secretary General, SSPX

St George’s House, Wimbledon.
27th June 2012.
Dear Father,
On the eve of the 20th anniversary of my priestly ordination, whilst giving thanks to Almighty God and Our Blessed Lady for such a great grace and mercy shown to me, I feel compelled to make known my thoughts on the current sufferings which have come to afflict our dear Society. 
 
Events in the Society over the last three months have led me first to sadness and anguish, and finally to despondency and anger.  The terrible divisions which now undermine our Society are not the fruit of rebellion and disobedience, but clearly are the result of a seismic change of principle on the part of our Superiors in the relation to Rome.  Abandoning the security and prudence of the position adopted by the Society at the last meeting of the General Chapter (2006), namely of refusing any practical agreement with the Roman authorities without there being any doctrinal resolution of the errors of the Second Vatican Council, has proved to be a disaster.  Consequently, the Society which was always united and strong is now fractured and weakened brother is turning against brother.  No convincing argument has been presented as a justification for such a fundamental shift in position the Holy Father has not altered in any way whatsoever his insistence upon the hermeneutic of continuity in relation to Tradition and the teachings of the last Council.  And yet, we are simply meant to accept the contrary.
 
This approach could not but produce the profound malaise that now affects our Society.  Additionally, the misuse of secrecy on such a grand scale by our current Superiors, accompanied by privileging a small group of trusted supports of the new policy towards Rome, has served to exacerbate this painful situation even further. 
Hence, it is abundantly clear to me that those who truly bear responsibility for the current storm are not those who have attempted to preserve our Society’s firmness and unambiguous profession of the Catholic Faith in relation to the Conciliar authorities but those who chose to abandon the wisdom of insisting upon a real conversion on the part of Modernist Rome before envisaging a practical agreement. 
 
In light of this, the Superior General's decision to exclude one of his brother bishops (chosen, as himself, by His Grace Archbishop Lefebvre) from the Chapter Meeting in July together with this refusal to ordain candidates from religious communities who have always shared with us the same battle for Tradition “until their loyalty can be ensured” are profoundly disturbing and unjust.  To simply have recourse to ever-increasing sanctions against those who oppose the novelty of the new policy – alluded to by Bishop Fellay for the first time in the March edition of Cor Unum – will only serve to create ever more division and do even more harm to the Society.  On the contrary, it is my profound conviction that only a return to our former position of insisting upon a real doctrinal conversion on the part of Rome before any practical agreement, will be able to restore once again peace and unity to our priestly Society, ever loyal to the example and spirit of our beloved founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. 
 
In Christo sacerdote et Maria Immaculata
 
Taken from a brazilian website.

Yes I've seen it.

Unfortunately there is always so much more to the story than meets the eye.

Personally I need to put my focus on Mary and her intentions and stop getting off track with all this stupid infighting.

I'm wasting my time on this earth paying attention or rather giving attention to all their bickering.

Thank you though for the letter Maria+ I appreciate it : )

God bless you always

Thank you D for the reply. As for myself is concerned, after reading that letter, I could say once more:

For gold and silver are tried in the fire, but acceptable men in the furnace of humiliation. Ecclesiasticus 2:5

God bless you always!!! 

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dawn Marie.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service