Bp Faure

Bp. Tissier de Mallerais, twenty years after his episcopal consecration1,
affirmed that nothing has been done by the conciliar popes to re-establish the faith.

“The great apostasy of which St. Paul speaks (2 Thess. 2-3) has not ceased to grow. The social
kingship of Christ is totally annihilated by religious liberty and the Rights of man” [of the
Second Vatican Council]. “Without the consecrations by Msgr. Lefebvre in 1988 we would be dead;
there would be no Fraternity of St. Peter nor anything else (neither Ecclesia Dei, nor Motu
Proprio, nor the Mass. . . ). Tradition would be dead—“Operation Survival” has been a complete
success thanks to the heroic action of Msgr. Lefebvre (still “excommunicated”. . . ) Nothing has
changed in Rome: Hardening of hearts, blinding of souls . . . . The parallel Church is the new
Church of Vatican II, and its new religion or “non-religion”.

Responding to a remark by his interviewer : “Many of those who fought alongside Msgr. Lefebvre
have a tendency at the present time to seek an accord with Rome, seeking a ‘more regular status’ in
the bosom of the Church”, Bp. Tissier de Mallerais replied: “Yes, there are many losses, for the
reason of a lack of principles, of infidelities to the fight of the Society (and of Msgr.
Lefebvre), because of a search for compromise, a wish for peace. These poor people, whether they be
priests or laity, are liberals, seduced by the smiles
of Vatican prelates. These are people tired out by the long combat for the Faith

. . . but this combat will last perhaps thirty more years – [That was ten years ago] – therefore,
do not put down your arms, do not seek for a reconciliation, but continue the fight!”

“My most memorable recollection of Msgr. Lefebvre? That of October 13, 1969, when he opened to us
the door at Fribourg in Switzerland, all alone, without any priest, to receive us, the nine
seminarians. All alone, 63 years old, he began everything again with us, poor young people!”

“Has the combat changed? Absolutely not. Nothing has changed— with few exceptions, the
bishops are enraged against the Mass – their new religion is opposed to the true Mass which
destroys their new and false religion, a religion without sacrifice, without expiation of sin,
without divine justice, without penance, without asceticism: the new religion of so-called “love,
love, love” . . . The fight against religious liberty [of the Second Vatican Council] cannot be
separated from the fight for the Mass. In the same way, the fight against ecumenism is a fight for
the social kingship of Christ.”

“Msgr. Rifan, of Campos, no longer combats the new mass, religious liberty, etc. . . . He has
had to stop fighting. Silence in the face of the heresies of the new religion, that is the price,
the sine qua non precondition, for ‘reconciliation’, for an agreement, for a Personal Prelature.”
[What can be said today of the ecumenism of him who had been invited to stay with the Society in
Switzerland, the conciliar bishop Msgr. Huonder? He is an originator of the celebration “Dies
Judaicus”, from now on obligatory in the Church in
Switzerland2. His stay is seemingly cancelled for the moment; what will
become of it in the future?]

“Msgr. Lefebvre was right: only bishops who are totally free of all influence from liberal Rome
will be able to work for the good of the Church.”
“What will be the greatest challenges in the course of the years immediately ahead? Above all, our
perseverance in refusing the errors of the council and our resolution to refuse all
“reconciliation” with occupied Rome. Msgr. Lefebvre used to cry out – even when speaking of
Benedict XVI (‘a true modernist’) – ‘Heretics, you pervert the faith of the faithful!’ “

“What will the next years bring? At Rome, the apostasy, which is the
product of their collaboration with the Jewish religion. [On this subject, look at the career of
him who perhaps will be nonetheless one day the guest of the Society, Msgr. Huonder2.] But soon
enough: ‘In the end my Immaculate Heart will triumph’ . . . with a new Catholic pope. This is not
the time to slacken; the devil, seeing that only a little time remains to him, makes haste to
destroy that which still resists him. [The SSPX, for example. . . ]

Ten years later, these statements of Msgr. Tissier have not become out of date. Thirty years after
the consecrations of 1988, not one line, not a single word needs to be modified. The situation in
the Church does nothing but worsen – who could pretend otherwise?

However, one change has intervened: before 2012 it was the conciliar Church which persecuted and
expelled those most faithful, while today it is Menzingen who, after having expelled one of its
bishops, numerous priests, and among them a permanent member of the Chapter, today expels
Oblate Society Sisters who take such good care of the little pupils of St. Michael’s School in
England. The reason? Their refusal to show allegiance to the conciliar Church by receiving the
local bishop and participating in a ceremony with the pupils. Nothing is more normal, in brief,
for a Society won over to Rome’s point of view; reconciled, and almost reabsorbed into the
conciliar Church, than to expel the recalcitrants who refuse to accept the apostasy of the new
religion.

The poison of the errors of the Council has penetrated into all the fibers of the Church: as
Benedict XVI said, the ship takes on water everywhere, and is close to capsizing both bodies and
souls, but Our Lord affirmed to us: “Her enemies will not prevail against Her.”

And Our Lady of La Salette said: “Fight, children of Light, the small number of you who can see . .
. the Church will be in eclipse, Rome will lose the Faith. May your zeal make you hungry for the
glory and the honor of Jesus Christ.”

Bp Faure

Replies to This Discussion