ALESSANDRO GNOCCHI: CHURCH INVERTED, CHURCH OF THE DEMON ~ Non Possumus

[Michael]

ALESSANDRO GNOCCHI: CHURCH INVERTED, CHURCH OF THE DEMON

SOURCE

CHURCH INVERTED, CHURCH OF THE DEMON (INFERNAL NOVEL)

It would be interesting to know if, in the Bergoglian pastoral topography, those curiae and seminaries populated by priests of all orders and degrees that corrupt minors, covet young priests, the gallant secretaries to take them to their bedrooms should also be considered as existential peripheries. If those dioceses and parishes are to be considered also as existential peripheries, where the high hierarchies, the hierarchs and guards of the holy Roman church violate girls, young women, adult women and force them to abort in the case of unfortunate pregnancies. If also existential peripheries should be considered those sacred congregations and courses of spiritual exercises frequented by men of God that are celebrated on rosaries of traces of pure coca and that, instead of reciting the breviary, matins, lauds and complete, leaf through the magazine "Vogue ", edition" USA ", of course.

If these were also peripheries, we should recognize that there reigns a surprising rational organization. Clean and well-maintained streets, no robberies, not even a vagabond urinating on the newly painted fences, not to mention a wild dog that growls against the Constituted Order. Model peripheries, in short, that do not include scandal and are equipped with proven protocols for the immediate concealment of rugged cases.

Peripheries so little peripheral, that are connected by long and fast preferential corridors with the Center of the Centers in which the scandals are covered and dissolve, provided that it is in grace with the Vicar. Vicar of himself, he seems to understand the most recent streams of the Ordinary Magisterium.

In such a perfect urban landscape, designed by such a skilful architect, built by such skillful masons and populated by such trained brothers, there is no stone thrown in the plaza that makes the Sacros Palacios tremble. This will also be the case, I am afraid, for the revelations of Monsignor Viganò about Theodor Edgar McCarrik, then cardinal, archbishop and serial predator of young people in the existential peripheries of Washington. This will be the case, I am afraid, because the mechanism of clerical perversion and its cover-ups that have come to the forefront of the general public in recent weeks is not an invention that can only be attributed for comfort and mental laziness to Bergoglio and his clique.

There is rottenness in Rome, where vice and silence have danced together from time immemorial, intra and extra walls, for a long time in an obscene ballet.

You need to live with it and have the courage to keep your eyes open. It is understandable that those who find out that their mother practices bad work are baffled, but the stupid obstinacy of those who think that they only started doing it in their old age is not justifiable. There is rottenness in Rome, there is too much, for too long and now it manifests itself without shame in dramatic events of planetary importance that require finding true and deep causes. If there was ever a time when it was allowed, this is no longer the time to be surprised. It is pathetic to hide behind the silent shadow of Benedict XVI, who has not yet explained to the people ignorant but always of God, the true reasons why he resigned.

And perhaps it is even more pathetic to take refuge in the last moments before the Second Vatican Council, as in a reduced version of Valtellina in the reactionary clerical version. The time has come to show a little courage and lucidity, at least for those who practice a profession almost as old as that of the mother.

I began to work on these considerations at the time of the murder of Alfie Evans, perpetrated with the flagrant consent of a good half of the Catholic Church and with the false repudiation of another good half. The ritual sacrifice of the child of Liverpool marked a point of no return that can not fall into oblivion of a Catholic world formed in the image and likeness of the media and ready to devour other events.

I digged, I asked questions and then I put together the pieces that gradually came to light. Thread after thread, letter after letter, contact after contact, reasoning after reasoning, the work has led me right where it had to lead me: to the heart of an inverted church, in front of that mechanism that has allowed, tolerated and covered for years and years. Dozens of McCarrick cases of which everyone knew everything or almost everything.

The sources are quoted with cursive letters that do not match the real names and are described in such a way that they are unrecognizable. They have said much more than I am going to tell you now and I can not play, if necessary, the possibility of a second round that will descend to a lower level in the reconstruction of this Infernal Novel.

THE RIVER OF FIRE UNDER OUR FEET  

It all begins in a hermitage beyond the Italian border on Saturday, April 21, seven days before Alfie's death. It's late and it's getting dark. After blessing me with spikenard oil, Father A. asks me to sit for another moment, before returning to the valley. " When I came here," he says, "my spiritual father warned me against one of the hardest trials a hermit faces, especially in these times: even though we think we are alone, under each hermitage flows a river that carries everything what is in the church, all good and all evil . " Instinctively I look at the ground beneath my feet, a gesture I have never made in a hermitage, where it is normal to look up, and I shudder. in which the river is impetuous and infernal, "Father A. continues. " It is in full swing and keeps rising, it never stops. In the hermitages the evil that is suffocating the church is suffered. If you want to know why this is happening, you have to find an exorcist. There are few good ones, but there are still some. He can tell you better than I do what it means to feel the agony of the church in his own skin. The exorcist is the one who is most in the river of fire trying to go against the current.

We talked all afternoon, and who knows how many more times over the years, about the agony of the church and the reasons why we face this test. I do not know if Father A. now perceives something terribly unprecedented, but the trust in the infernal river that flows under each hermitage and the invitation to ask for information from an exorcist does not leave me alone.

Normally, when I get home after being in this place, the lights of the street and the city bother me. Now, somehow, they comfort me and I do not like this. Lord Jesus Christ Son of God have mercy on me sinner, Lord Jesus Christ Son of God have mercy on me sinner ...

WITHOUT FAITH, WITHOUT EXORCISMS  

I know two exorcists I trust. In fact, they are two former exorcists because both have been removed from office, which is a guarantee. The easiest to locate is a diocesan priest, Don B. Easy to locate only remotely, because he only answers the phone when he is sure of the identity of those who call him and, once the contact is established, it is necessary to line up with the faithful who ask for special blessings and prayers of healing.

See you on Tuesday, May 2nd. Alfie Evans died four days earlier under world attention while Don B. did nothing but pray. " It would be a mistake to say that the person who prays does it uselessly, prayer is never useless, but that child was sacrificed anyway, we have to ask ourselves what all this means, how much faith do we have?"

How much faith do we have if the Lord does not listen to us? This, in short, is the question for which I am here, although it is more detailed and articulated. Father A. says that only an exorcist can give an idea of ​​how terrible what is happening because he feels it on his skin ... " The skin of the soul, the skin of the spirit and also the skin of the body, " says Don B. , who knows what the hermit was referring to.

" Today the exorcisms have very little effect, most of them have none, because the church no longer has faith, I mean true faith, in the One God and Triune revealed by Jesus Christ, because you can have faith in anything I do not mean individual members, but the body as a whole Do not make me talk about the Mystical Body, because we would go too far What I mean is that for now the tumor has metastasized everywhere and the few cells still healthy They are isolated from each other. "This is what Father A. wanted me to tell you and there is no one who can say it with the same conscious pain of an exorcist who is fighting without weapons against Satan, they changed the ritual and it was a tremendous blow for the work of the exorcists, but even more lethal is the systematic disbelief in the existence of the devil that can only depend on the lack of faith in the Triune God, and this concerns the whole church. can Free a creature from the devil, a battle is fought in which it succumbs to the enemy. This is what an exorcist who wants to fulfill his duty feels in his own skin. Physical and spiritual pain that proves itself and because of the impotence before the spiritual and physical suffering of those possessed by the devil. The exorcism is a sacramental and is effective by virtue of the sanctity of the priest, of the faith of the person for whom it is performed, and of the faith of the whole Church. Church weak and without faith, weak exorcism and without effectiveness. Is it enough for you? "

It's enough for me and it's not enough for me. I want facts and dates. It is not that they are secrets kept in a secret chest, but I have come here for Don B. to repeat them once more. Don B. likes to ask: "What is the text of Sacred Scripture with the most powerful exorcism ?" The prologue to the Gospel of St. John. " What particular passage?" "In propria venit, et sui eum non receperunt Quotquot autem receperunt eum, dedit eis potestatem filios Dei fieri, his creditor in nomine eius, qui non ex sanguinibus, neque ex voluntate carnis, neque ex voluntate viri, sed ex Deo nati sunt. " " When was the first rite enacted? of exorcism by the Universal Church? " I do not know." In 1614. And what about the Prologue of San Juan? " That has always been used . "It is no coincidence that Leo XIII, when he introduced the exorcism in the Mass, and not outside it as many say, placed it right after the Prologue." The Pope's decree came into force in 1886, after two years before a vision of the work of Satan in the church.

At this point Don B. stops because he is going to say something but, because of a duty of hospitality, he allows me to have the pleasure of doing it myself: then everything was swept away on September 26, 1964, in full Vatican Council II, with the institution Inter oecumenici .

But, as I said, it would be too easy to draw the conclusion that everything in the church worked perfectly until midnight on September 25, 1964 or until a minute before the opening of Vatican II. Don B. approves, although reluctantly. He is less radical than me, but he recognizes that some are the movements of the affections and others the demands of reason. However, this is a question that we will deal with in the future. Before blessing me, he asks me if I have ever read Malachi Martin's books, in particular La Casa Azotada por el viento . "You got it?" Caught! As children say playing.

SATAN ENTHRONED IN THE VATICAN. ONLY FICTION?

Prior to Don B., Father A. also cited Malachi Martin's Wind-Wounded House as a reliable source. I have already read it and, apart from the trust in the judgments of Father A. and Don B., to take it seriously it is enough to point out that the usual Vatican expert, I think in 2011, called it a foolish thing worthy of the worst Dan Brown. Then, in 2013, what Malachi Martin had foreseen happened: the resignation of a pope who had shown benevolence with the mass in the ancient rite.

The book, which in English meets the title of Windswept House , is a key novel published in 1996 and whose author says that 95% is pure reality. (1)

Malachi Martin, who died in 1999, was a former Jesuit who knew from within the high levels of the Roman Curia and quite a few existential peripheries of the clergy-chic on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. He was, among other things, a collaborator of Cardinal Augustin Bea, a role that gave him access to confidential documents, and it is said that among them also the Third Secret of Fatima.

His bibliographical production is respectable in the field of non-fiction literature, but, evidently, Martín understood that it is often easier to tell the truth in the form of fiction.

To give an example, about ten years before the scandal of sexual predator priests broke out in the United States, in his novel he described a situation that, in the exact translation of Francesco Colafemmina, is presented to us in this way:

Suddenly it became incontestable that now, in this papacy, there existed within the Catholic Church the permanent presence of clerics who worshiped Satan and liked to do it, of bishops and priests who sodomized children and sodomized each other, nuns who celebrated Wicca's "black rites" and maintained lesbian relationships inside and outside their convents. It was suddenly clear that during this papacy the Catholic Church had become a place where every day, including Sundays and feast days, men called to be priests committed acts of heresy, blasphemy, sacrilege and indifference to the sacred altars. Not only sacrilegious acts were committed before the altars, but they had the complicity or at least the approval of certain cardinals, archbishops and bishops "... Then we read:" Homosexuality and Satanism were among the oldest viruses that infected the political body of the Church. The difference now was that homosexuality and Satanism had acquired a new status in that political body. "

But the most interesting revelation of Martin's novel, which is a chronicle of contemporary events, refers to the background that explains them all: on June 29, 1963, on the occasion of the election and coronation of Paul VI, a group of priests and high prelates celebrated in the Pauline Chapel a satanic ritual to crown Satan and enthrone him in the heart of the Catholic Church. In the impossibility of performing a complete ritual inside the Apostolic Palace, the Satanists held two rites simultaneously, one in the Vatican without the victim and another bloody in the United States: technically, a concelebration, which would be introduced a few years later in the rite Catholic with the new mass.

In the description of the ritual complex related by the author, it is necessary to show that the formula of consecration of the Eucharist is recited and the inverted blessing is imparted. The choice of the Pauline Chapel as the seat of the Roman ritual can be understood by thinking of what Professor Antonio Paolucci, director of the Vatican Museums, says to emphasize the role of the heart of Catholicism: " In a certain sense, this Chapel, more than the Chapel Sistine, is the place of identity of the Catholic Church and when the Blessed Sacrament is exposed on the altar, the role of the Pope, guardian of Corpus Christi, in the legitimacy of the apostolic succession and in the fidelity of Orthodoxy, is perfectly significant " It would not have been possible to enthrone Satan as the hidden head of the church in a more concretely symbolic place than this one.

If the credibility of Malachi Martin is judged ex post, it is honestly hard not to take it seriously. In addition to checking the correspondence with the reality of the events, men and environments of which he speaks in the novel, it would suffice to read an essay of his also available in Italian, published in his time by Sugarco and unambiguously entitled The Jesuits. The power and secret mission of the Society of Jesus in the world where faith and politics meet . And it should be noted that the Pauline Chapel was reconsecrated by Benedict XVI in 2009, when it was reopened to the public after its restoration. Why?

OPEN DOOR TO THE HOLY OFFICE

There is a friend who can tell me if this is confirmed today. I have never written a line against colleagues who brought to light the Vatican scandals of red light and white powder. I know that most of them work on certain sources and, even when they do so with a grudge against the Catholic faith, they do not write anything invented. They have no need. If you want to know with certainty what happens behind the walls, you have to rely more on the reporters who do their work than on the Vatican, except for exceptions that can be counted on the fingers of the hand, even less.

Colleague C., with whom I speak at the beginning of June, works in the Roman writing of a newspaper that is anything but a friend, but he is a friend. Just a year before, he had followed the story of drug-based homosexual celebrations held inside the palace of the old Holy Office, just a step away from Bernini's colonnade, by Archbishop Luigi Capozzi, secretary of Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio.

"Do you want me to help you deny it or do you want me to tell you the truth ?" C. enjoys provoking, but he knows what I want. I care to know to what level it is reached. "Do you want to know if the cardinal was aware of the secretary's homosexual activities? They were together in the office until nightfall Do not get me wrong, eh? Do you want to know what they're complaining about in Santa Marta? They ran out of breath because Capozzi was on the list to be a bishop and they had not yet reached a point where it would have been almost impossible to return.Do you want an interesting detail? The entrance to the old palace of the Holy Office overlooks the Plaza del Santo Oficio, in Italian territory, and you enter without any border control, then, once inside, you go directly to the Vatican State, always without any control, almost anyone can do it, let's say, taking with you almost everyone and Everything you want, as long as it's not cumbersome, I let you imagine everything that goes through the building that was once the Inquisition ... " A mockery of Satan? "You are the specialist." When it comes to these high-level events, do you remember the Nuzzi disaster at the altar boys' school? Here we need a note from the editor to explain that it is the pre-seminary Saint Pius X, which came out to the front page for the testimony of a seminarian who spoke of sexual abuse. " I do not know if you've seen how it ended ... Your friends ..." Another editor's note: C. has fun provoking me with this insult. "Your friends they have explained that they were `only 'homosexual relationships between equals. Do you know what I mean? I repeat "only" homosexual relations . "

EMANUELA ORLANDI AND THE SIGN OF THE DRAGON

With these arguments we could spend all night, and almost do, but talking about a case opened since 1983, Emanuela Orlandi. When he disappeared on the night of June 22 35 years ago, Emanuela was 15 years old. She was the daughter of an employee of the Pontifical Prefecture and a citizen of the Vatican State. No one has known about her since then. My colleague C. is a few years older than me and then he was a reporter with enough experience to be included in the case. Even today, this story is still spoken with great caution out of respect for the family, but it is useless to hide the fact that hypotheses are also made that are fully inscribed in the topics we are dealing with.

I know what C thinks, and he knows I want to write it. I begin by quoting Father Amorth. In his memoirs The Last Exorcist , Amorth explains that the devil has always tempted the highest hierarchies of the Church and places the death of Emanuela Orlandi within this framework:

"I think a 15-year-old girl does not get into a car if she does not know the person who asks her to go up. I think it would be convenient to investigate inside and not outside the Vatican. Or also inquire about the people who somehow knew Emanuela . Because, in my opinion, only someone Emanuela knew well could have induced her to get into a car. Often the satanic sects act like this: they get a girl into a car and then they make her disappear. "

So waiting. "What do you want me to say?" There has been talk of this track from the beginning, but those who have followed it have always encountered a strange resistance, even a menacing one, and we all stopped in front of one of those walls that your friend Bergoglio does not seem to want to knock down. But if it is the right track, where should the investigation go? " It seems to me that Amorth has given very specific indications. This is news that you brought me. Let's put it this way: the most famous of the exorcists says something that looks a lot like what almost all the journalists who have dealt with the case think and what a repentant mafioso said, who gave away everything he wanted, but was taken seriously by Borsellino and I would not dismiss it so easily . "

If you mean Vincenzo Calcara, he went much further, he also said where to look for Emanula Orlandi's body and that, when digging there, they would not only find his ... " Yes, but I would stop one step before. it can be added that Calcara links Monsignor Marcinkus with the Orlandi case, to whom he says he delivered a lot of drugs in the Plaza de San Pedro when he was in the company of a monsignor who later became a cardinal of the first order, who now I would be behind Bergoglio, Marcinkus is dead and can not deny it, the cardinal, if there was one, we do not know who he could be. " Come on, not even as a hypothesis ... " No, stop, I repeat: if there were, we do not know who it could be, that's exactly what you will write about it ."

For the sake of the completeness of the information, I refer to the fact that, in the Orlandi case, the name of Monsignor Marcinkus is also associated with the activity of the Magliana band, but many exonerate it because, they assure us, he preferred mature women.

" Rather, you should know something else, " says C. " In fact, you should come with me when I follow certain characters that, if you see them around Rome, you do not even imagine that an hour earlier they might have said mass and communion . they love the change of identity, the disguise, that's my opinion, but when I see them on the altar I think that even there they enjoy the disguise, I do not understand it and I do not know what they consecrate, you are the one who talks about the inverted church. I'm telling you as profane, there's a monster in there. "

It was Monseñor D., who works within the leonine walls, who spoke to me some time ago about something that looks tremendously like a monster. He had used the term "Dragon" to give a better idea of ​​the personified evil manifested through the embezzlement of the Eucharistic Body and, as a natural or preternatural accessory, homosexual harassment. " You should see what happens in certain sacristies, my dear, I always hope that during certain Masses the consecrated hosts will be consumed to avoid what may happen later . Do you know that these gentlemen prefer to celebrate the new Mass in the old churches, where there is still a tabernacle in the center of the high altar? You know why? Because when they lean on the new altar at the moment of consecration, they show their asses to the Most High. It is the sign of the Dragon . " Monsignor D. had also told me about an acquaintance, a newly married layman, approached and harassed by the serial predator on duty on his first day of work in the Vatican." We were attentive and protected him, but it is not always possible to frustrate the work of these transvestites . "

THE SHEPHERD WHO SMELLS CACHEMIR

The talk with C. and the memory of what Monsignor D. had told me, that insistence on transvestism, took me about ten days, until the end of May, this time to Milan, the capital of fashion. The colleague E. is a radical chic, very radical and very sophisticated. We did our internship in the same newspaper about thirty years ago and we gave the professional exam in the same session. It's like being soldiers together, you're a friend in spite of everything. Now E. works for a fashion magazine and lives in fashion shows and catwalks, as the people of the world say, between Paris, Milan and New York, which I never understood if it means half or in each of these positions. Obviously it is too cosmopolitan for a peasant from Bergamo.

I called E. immediately after that transvestite festival that was the "Met Gala" that was held in New York on May 7 , with a large number of high and low clerics. It should be noted that the "Met Gala", organized by the "Metropolitan Museum of Art" in New York in collaboration with "Vogue USA", is the most anticipated social event by the international fashion system and each year is dedicated to a theme different. The 2018 edition was particularly "different", and this can be seen in the title: "Celestial Bodies: Fashion and Catholic Imagination". The clothes and the sacred ornaments, provided by the Vatican thanks to the good offices, in the first place, of Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, were put "in dialogue" with the creations of Coco Chanel, Donatella Versace, Jean-Paul Gaultier, Dolce & Gabbana, John Galliano, Cristóbal Balenciaga and similar. On the red carpet, have marched, among others, the pope Rihanna with miter, Jared Leto in style Baroque Christ, Jennifer Lopez in cruciform habit, Madonna priestess blasphemous-chic, Sarah Jessica Parker with a crèche on the head, Lily Collins crying like a Mater Dolorosa.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan, archbishop of the existential peripheries of New York, avoided the catwalk, but, faithful to the principle of remaining with one foot in the sacristy and the other in the brothel, he presented himself gladly at the opening reception and posed smiling with his hostess, Anna Wintour, in the role of a perfect papisa in a Chanel, accompanied by her daughter Bee, in red Valentino. Friendly smiles and narrow hands were squandered in a luciferian red atmosphere, among the crowd that waved rosaries, brandishing crosses, holding bags in the shape of a ciborium. In short, a new frontier of pastoral strategy, with the imprimatur of Cardinal Ravasi, who said: " The selection offered by the exhibition is marked by an undoubtedly sumptuous quality: it has been exalted in the Baroque period, but has remained in the liturgical adornment of the following centuries, it was wanted, by this way, to proclaim the divine transcendence, the sacred separation of the cult of everyday frivolity, the splendor of mystery . "

It was necessary to remind those who are not familiar with this environment, what was this event celebrated by the international fashion system, to understand what follows.

CLERICAL IMPRESSION FASHION

The colleague E., as always, on the phone pretends not to remember where and with whom she has done the internship and looks the usual thin-fashion air. I hoped to get something out of him, instead I felt like in a kind of press release and an underlying suggestion for him to renounce it. Then, a couple of weeks later, E. calls me and says, "Are you there tomorrow, late in the morning ?" F. comes from the US If you're still interested in the news about the Met Gala, it's the I'm sorry, but the last time I had too many people around, I could not speak, goodbye. " E. announces the arrival of F. as the passage of the Pilgrim MTA in Italy in the 1950s. fashion world, F is someone, even I know it, speaks a New York fashion slang even more indecipherable than the jargon of the Bergamo Valley, F. speaks and E. translates.

We have little time and the crucial question is this: how could the men of the church be found in that important fashion world?

"Look, they are much more comfortable than you can imagine, I do not know how you Catholics see things, but according to me, they have a church that does not exist in mind, it's not for me to say it, but I think they should be a day, they say that, I think, if there was someone truly worldly in the whole show, it was the priests who followed the whole organization and those who participated as protagonists and behind the scenes, I did not notice any difference between them and, what do I know? I? Rihanna, Jared Leto, Jennifer Lopez, Madonna ... The same pleasure for the chic transgression, for the disguise ... I do not know how to say better ... In this, yes, in giving a different meaning to the habits that They carry". Is   say, desecrate ... " Yes, I understand what you say, I think so, but for me it is positive, I think that the intelligent and cultured man has the task of desacralizing, what is fashion if not this? a behavior and then change it to a fair will . "Invest? " If the term clarifies everything, yes, invest, turn, but abusing the power that is in hand . "

THE CULT TO THE MONKEY

The circle closes as it should have closed, around an inverted church that professes an inverted faith and shapes an inverted man who feeds on an inverted spirituality, celebrates a ritual inverted in inverted temples and practices an inverted morality.

There is a passage from the Mystagogy of St. Maximus the Confessor that seems written precisely to explain how F.'s thought applies to the propagation of investment in the Catholic Church. The fourth chapter, in which the building of the church is compared to the structure of the human being:

"And even more, the holy Church of God is like man: the sanctuary is the soul, the divine altar is the intellect, and the ship is the body, being the image and likeness of man, who was created in the image and likeness of God. through the nave, as through a body, moral philosophy, exposes spiritually through the sanctuary, as through a soul, natural and manifest contemplation, through the divine altar as through an intellect, the mystical theology In turn, man is a mystical church, through the body, as through the nave, makes the practical faculty of the soul shine virtuously thanks to moral philosophy, through the soul, as through the sanctuary , offers to God the logoi of sensible perception, separated from matter in total purity of spirit thanks to reason, by natural contemplation, through the intellect, as through the altar, invokes the silence of the great invisible voice and unknown of the Divinity, celebrated in the Holy of Holies, with a loquacious and resounding silence. And for how much man is granted, thanks to mystical theology, he lives near the Divinity and becomes as he should be the one who has been judged worthy of the visit of God and is characterized by his sign with his glorious splendors. "

It is enough to enter any church of today, of new construction or simply adapted to the new rite, to understand that there is nothing in its place. Everything has been turned upside down, reversing the image of man and of divinity. But the building is still a temple and, in a temple, a cult is celebrated, and here lies the problem: where the true God represented according to his true image is not worshiped, his monkey represented according to his inverted image is worshiped instead. Like it or not.  

The church that recognizes itself in this inversion, saving the healthy cells that Don B. spoke of, is called an atheist, but it is an improper definition. Maybe it was, but by its nature can not be, necessarily must believe in something, otherwise it would not be a church. It seems an atheistic church because of the planetary propagation of sexual inversion, the change in morality and doctrine or the denial of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. But these are only signs, simple consequences, of the inversion of faith and not of its absence. They are not the final goal of the monkey of God, but only an instrument and the money that the monkey uses and with which he pays his servants. Violence and submission, when they enter the intimacy of the body, of thought and of the soul, become instruments of power and satisfaction.

The true design is the desecration of Our Lord Jesus Christ, of his image, of the buildings in which he is worshiped, of the vestments and objects made for his worship, of the bodies and souls of his faithful and, above all, of his Body Eucharistic It is not true that the priests of the inverted cult do not believe in the transubstantiation of bread and wine at the moment of consecration. They know very well that everything is true, they need the miracle to be performed because only in this way can they celebrate the ritual that makes the demonic, gross and profane metaphysical violence visible and concrete. They want the faithful and the multitude of priests trained in doubt not to believe it so that, in the face of the real presence, such indifference may spread that it does not disturb their profane worship. You do not defend what you do not believe. The substantial atheism of the people of God is an instrument of the inverted faith of the infernal elites.

That is why it would be a grave mistake to be outraged only from the human point of view by the obscene enterprises of sexual predatory clerics. Not only are they terrible acts at the level of natural law, they are above all terrible acts at the level of the supernatural law because they are an affront to God made in the name of Satan. These are the prodromes and the consequences of the monkey cult. And he who hides even one of them, becomes a servant of the devil, as and more than the one who does it.

__________________________

(1) In the translation to Spanish of the book of Fr. Malachi Martin " Windswept House" , the title has been changed to " The Last Pope" . Read that book here .

ALESSANDRO GNOCCHI: CHURCH INVERTED, CHURCH OF THE DEMON ~ Non Poss...