PP. Leo-The Disarming One
For those seeing him wear some traditional vestments and for those who say PP. Leo says the TLM may I just put this out there....so did all the bishops, cardinals, priests and pope (s) during the Arian heresy. According to St. Athanasius they were still not Catholic and he warned people to not go to their Masses or even to not go to the Masses of bishops who were in dialogue with the heretics.
[Controversy over Arianism arose in the late 3rd century and persisted throughout most of the 4th century. It involved most church members—from simple believers, priests, and monks to bishops, emperors, and members of Rome's imperial family. Two Roman emperors, Constantius II and Valens, became Arians or semi-Arians, as did prominent Gothic, Vandal, and Lombard warlords both before and after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The antipopes Felix II[21] and Ursinus[f] were Arian, and Pope Liberius was forced to sign the Arian Creed of Sirmium of 357—though the letter says he willingly agreed with Arianism.[22][23][24][25] Such a deep controversy within the early Church during this period could not have materialized without significant historical influences providing a basis for the Arian doctrines.[26]
An imagined portrait of Arius. Detail of a Cretan School icon, c. 1591, depicting the First Council of Nicaea
Arius had been a pupil of Lucian of Antioch at Lucian's private academy in Antioch and inherited from him a modified form of the teachings of Paul of Samosata.[27] Arius taught that God the Father and the Son of God did not always exist together eternally]
This man's ultimate desire (it is one of the few things he is passionate about) is to implement the synodal church to replace the Catholic Church. For those who have eyes to see he says so in his initial speech.
He is a canon lawyer and he chooses his words carefully. He was the catalyst in throwing out the conservative Bp. Strickland while also being the catalyst in elevating the deviant Mcelroy to a prominent position.
He was in essence Bergoglio's right hand man. He is the one Bergoglio wanted to replace him when he died and he set up the voting in the conclave to achieve this by making sure there were more than 2/3 those who would vote him in.
In PP. Leo's speech he thanked FRANCIS but he did not thank Our Lord. This is very telling and concerning.
For those who are tempted to believe maybe PP. Leo is good, please let me point out that while he is saying the TLM and wearing the traditional vestments with his right hand he will finish the job Bergoglio started in tearing down the Catholic Church and raising up the synodal church with his left.
He will do these things while speaking things people want to hear (and they want to hear Catholic things rightly so), he will do these things (building his beloved synodal church) while wearing trad garb and saying the TLM. IT WILL NOT MAKE HIM AN UN-HERETIC when he does so.
That is to say IF God even gives him the chance to do so.
I don't say these things to be a downer but to ask souls to be cautious. PP. Leo is one who can be characterized as disarming. In this case this is not a charming quality but quite possibly one that gets Catholics to lay down their arms without any resistance whatsoever.
Lastly NO ONE absolutely NO ONE has even considered whether PP. Leo would even entertain the thought of consecrating Russia. If we are to consider his undying loyalty to Francis we can at least venture to guess that the answer he would make would be no as he would say Francis already did so.
Pray your rosary, ask Our Lady and Our Lord Jesus Christ to guide you/us through this mess the Church is currently in and pray for PP. Leo.
The office of the Pope can change a man it is true but please do not disregard all else that he wills to do in tearing down the Catholic Church for this alone. His future acts/actions are what must be carefully considered.
UIMIH
DM
Views: 161
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Dawn Marie on
-
Posted by Fr. James Altman:
SO. ABOUT THAT NEW POPE.
Dear family, many have been asking me about Prevost, the new "pope." As obviously has been the case since the hierarchy betrayed us in their altar boy-raping and cover up, and abandoned us during the covid-plan-demic, the vast majority of the hierarchy have betrayed and abandoned us once again.
Has anyone sensed how absolutely irrelevant the Catholic Church has become under apostate Bergoglio and the anti-Catholic synodal-way he has tried to establish?
Does anyone really even care that this new guy "made history" as the first American pope? Factually, he is a relative unknown "American" with ZERO heroic pedigree of persecution for the Catholic Faith.
Was anyone - except for the likes of James Martin or Blase Cupich - really cheering for Prevost when he suddenly appeared on the balcony? Can you imagine the cheers that would have rung out had someone like Cardinal Sarah or Cardinal Zen stepped out?! That really tells us all we need to know. We have been betrayed and abandoned once again.I understand that his history is aligned with "Bergoglio the Apostate," such that he is aligned with the globalist communist agenda as seen in the climate change hoax, the anti-Catholic open-borders heresy, and Bergoglio's false message of "mercy?" [remember: no sin, then no repentance, then no absolution nor forgiveness. period.]
Has any REAL Catholic not already "put two and two together" and, knowing that the Catholic Church essentially is financially bankrupt, figured out that the reason Bergoglio's boys voted in Prevost was to strong-arm the United States into using tax-payer money to fund such things as Catholic Charities which did such evil things? Does any REAL Catholic not already know that Catholic NGO's used our taxpayer money in so many corrupt ways to pay for the Godless globalist agenda throughout the world, an agenda that even facilitated child sex slaves crossing the southern border? (I can't wait to see the names that show up on the Epstein list and other investigations)
Does any REAL Catholic not already know that Prevost's "election" was all about U.S. taxpayer dollars?
FACT: A REAL Catholic Pope would begin every proclamation with the proclamation voiced by every prophet, St. John the Baptist and Jesus Christ the Lord: REPENT and BELIEVE and GO AND SIN NO MORE. PERIOD.
THAT is the REAL Gospel, the Real Deposit of Faith, handed down unchanged and unchangeable, over 2,000 years of Saints and Martyrs, and not that utter TRIPE that Prevost spewed forth from the balcony.
Memo to Prevost: there is NO bridge that can be built over the unbridgeable chasm between Heaven and Hell.
A REAL Catholic Pope would preach the words of Jesus as regards sin and salvation - the reason Jesus came in the first place - and not some latest version of the heretical "liberation theology" that originally came out of heretical South American hierarchy whereafter Prevost spent so much time in Peru.
So in betraying and abandoning us, it certainly seems that Bergoglio's boys got the anti-Trump American Cardinal they wanted who now will try to use the Jesus's Catholic Church to undermine this sovereign nation through the same methodical and heretical misrepresentation of Catholicism as Bergoglio did.
So be it. As St. Pio said, pray, hope and don't worry.
So, the question to ask is not what is my opinion, the best question to ask is will Prevost be Catholic?
Here are four simple tests to get us started - though rest assured, this only is a start to proving he actually is Catholic:
1. Will he take away the red hats from Mahoney and Wuerl, two of the absolute worst altar-boy-raper-cover-uppers in the history of the entire Catholic Church, and demote and get rid of every other such viper in the hierarchy? [don't hold your breath on this one - in his position as honcho over the dicastery for bishops, he did nothing about the cancer in the USCCB]
2. Will he remove McElroy from DC - McElroy being the treasonous poster boy for the criminal invasion of our southern border - and immediately put that viper out to pasture?
3. Will he publicly apologize for the Abu Dhabi agreement, reconsecrate St. Peter's after the Pachamama abomination, re-assert that there is only one true Church and not many "ways" to Heaven, and end the anti-Catholic idiocy of synodality?
4. Will he publicly acknowledge the apostacy of Bergoglio regarding traditionis custodis, and ORDER every bishop in the world, as did Pope Benedict XVI, to allow, encourage and enable the only Dogmatic Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in the Roman Rite Church - commonly known as the Traditional Latin Mass?
If the answers to any or all of these four questions are "no," then every time he henceforth rears his ugly anti-Catholic head, he is to be opposed as an anti-pope in the line of Bergoglio, along with every bishop or cardinal who enables his error. He, and they, must be publicly and vigorously excoriated for any diabolical contravention of the Deposit of Faith.
But honestly, I really do not have to state the obvious to every real Catholic. These things we already know.
Dear family, God gave us a brain and He expects us to use it. So instead of asking my opinion regarding Prevost, instead, ask "is he Catholic?" The fact that he let Bergoglio get away with apostacy for over a decade as Bergoglio led eight billion people down the road to Perdition seems to already have answered that question. Regardless, henceforth Prevost's actions will continue to answer that question, loudly and clearly.
-
Permalink Reply by Veronica Mowery on
-
From a reputable Facebook post. I saved this as it makes the situation clearer.
"Quick Facts About the new Pope, Leo XIV (Former Cardinal Robert Prevost) - the first American Pope (originally from Chicago):1. Cardinal Prevost, in his capacity as Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops, was instrumental in the elimination of conservative clergy and selecting left leaning priests to be elevated to Bishoprics loyal to Francis' vision.2. He is extremely tight with higher ranking members of the United Nations and said to have an excellent relationship with UN administrators due to several years of managing the Augustinian NGO.3. He was instrumental in eliminating the Latin Mass on behalf of Francis.4. He was opposed to "gender ideology" in 2012, but he has not mentioned anything about it in recent years. He has said that church members should be "free to express who they are" in Church.5. He essentially wiped out all "right wing" Catholic organizations in Latin America from his role as president of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America.6. He was accused of hiding child molesters within church run facilities near schools.7. He is a major proponent of mass migration and open borders - even having won an award and praise for supporting Venezuelan migrants.8. He worked closely with George Soros' Open Society Foundations in his missionary capacity and thereafter. "Both Prevost and the Open Society Foundations share a commitment to social justice and supporting those who are marginalized or in need. Prevost's support for Francis's vision of greater openness and reform within the Church, as well as his own advocacy for social issues, aligns with the Open Society Foundations' work."
-
Permalink Reply by Penelope Smith on
-
God bless you for opening our eyes. Thank you much. Prayers for the conversion of our church leaders.
-
Permalink Reply by Joseph on
-
I agree with Fr. Altman, HOWEVER, he needs to understand that the problems in the church didn’t start with Bergolio. He needs to understand that VCII was when the enemies of the church came out into the open. He needs to understand that the “traditional “ Benedict XVI was just as much a problem as Bergolio and when enough clergy turn their backs on VCII then maybe the Church can be reformed.
-
Permalink Reply by Margie on
-
If this is true, and I'm not doubting it, then God has allowed this "Francis clone" to be Pope because it's what the world deserves. Our sins are so great and unrepentant in the eyes of God that perhaps this is meant to serve as a wake-up-call to Catholics to pray harder and sincerely that Pope Leo XIV isn't allowed to finish the work that Francis started. May his namesake, Pope Leo XIII ask God to send St. Michael the Archangel to "defend us in battle, and be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the Devil." May Pope Leo XIV heed this message before he destroys his own Soul and takes his followers with him.
-
-
VATICAN CITY—Pope Leo XIV met with the entire College of Cardinals, today.
He reveals one of the reasons he chose his name, “Leo XIV”, following the legacy of Pope Leo XIII:
Rerum Novarum
“In our own day, the Church offers to everyone the treasury of her social teaching in response to another industrial revolution and to developments in the field of artificial intelligence that pose new challenges for the defence of human dignity, justice and labour.”————————-
Full text:“Thank you very much, Your Eminence. Before taking our seats, let us begin with a prayer, asking the Lord to continue to accompany this College, and above all the entire Church with this spirit, with enthusiasm, but also with deep faith. Let us pray together in Latin.
Pater noster… Ave Maria…
In the first part of this meeting, there will be a short talk with some reflections that I would like to share with you. But then there will be a second part, a bit like the opportunity that many of you had asked for: a sort of dialogue with the College of Cardinals to hear what advice, suggestions, proposals, concrete things, which have already been discussed in the days leading up to the Conclave.
Dear Brother Cardinals,
I greet all of you with gratitude for this meeting and for the days that preceded it. Days that were sad because of the loss of the Holy Father Pope Francis and demanding due to the responsibilities we confronted together, yet at the same time, in accordance with the promise Jesus himself made to us, days rich in grace and consolation in the Spirit (cf. Jn 14:25-27).You, dear Cardinals, are the closest collaborators of the Pope. This has proved a great comfort to me in accepting a yoke clearly far beyond my own limited powers, as it would be for any of us.
Your presence reminds me that the Lord, who has entrusted me with this mission, will not leave me alone in bearing its responsibility. I know, before all else, that I can always count on his help, the help of the Lord, and through his grace and providence, on your closeness and that of so many of our brothers and sisters throughout the world who believe in God, love the Church and support the Vicar of Christ by their prayers and good works.
I thank the Dean of the College of Cardinals, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re – who deserves applause, at least once, if not more – whose wisdom, the fruit of a long life and many years of faithful service to the Apostolic See, has helped us greatly during this time. I thank the Camerlengo of the Holy Roman Church, Cardinal Kevin Joseph Farrell – I believe he is present today – for the important and demanding work that he has done throughout the period of the Vacant See and for the convocation of the Conclave. My thoughts also go to our brother Cardinals who, for reasons of health, were unable to be present, and I join you in embracing them in communion of affection and prayer.
At this moment, both sad and joyful, providentially bathed in the light of Easter, I would like all of us to see the passing of our beloved Holy Father Pope Francis and the Conclave as a paschal event, a stage in that long exodus through which the Lord continues to guide us towards the fullness of life. In this perspective, we entrust to the “merciful Father and God of all consolation” (2 Cor 1:3) the soul of the late Pontiff and also the future of the Church Beginning with Saint Peter and up to myself, his unworthy Successor, the Pope has been a humble servant of God and of his brothers and sisters, and nothing more than this. It has been clearly
seen in the example of so many of my Predecessors, and most recently by Pope Francis himself, with his example of complete dedication to service and to sober simplicity of life, his abandonment to God throughout his ministry and his serene trust at the moment of his return to the Father’s house. Let us take up this precious legacy and continue on the journey, inspired by the same hope that is born of
faith.”“It is the Risen Lord, present among us, who protects and guides the Church, and continues to fill her with hope through the love “poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us” (Rom 5:5). It is up to us to be docile listeners to his voice and faithful ministers of his plan of salvation, mindful that God loves to communicate himself, not in the roar of thunder and earthquakes, but in the “whisper of a gentle breeze” (1 Kings 19:12) or, as some translate it, in a “sound of sheer silence.”
It is this essential and important encounter to which we must guide and accompany all the holy People of God entrusted to our care. In this regard, I would like us to renew together today our complete commitment to the path
that the universal Church has now followed for decades in the wake of the Second Vatican Council.Pope Francis masterfully and concretely set it forth in the Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium,
from which I would like to highlight several fundamental points: the return to the primacy of Christ in proclamation (cf. No. 11); the missionary conversion of the entire Christian community (cf. No. 9); growth in collegiality and synodality (cf. No. 33); attention to the sensus fidei (cf. Nos. 119-120), especially in its most authentic and inclusive forms, such as popular piety (cf. No. 123); loving care for the least and the rejected (cf. No. 53); courageous and trusting dialogue with the contemporary world in its various components and realities (cf. No. 84; SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL, Pastoral
Constitution Gaudium et Spes, 1-2).These are evangelical principles that have always inspired and guided the life and activity of God’s Family. In these values, the merciful face of the Father has been revealed and continues to be revealed in his incarnate Son, the ultimate hope of all who sincerely seek truth, justice, peace and fraternity (cf. BENEDICT XVI, Spe Salvi, 2; FRANCIS, Spes Non Confundit, 3).
Sensing myself called to continue in this same path, I chose to take the name Leo XIV. There are different reasons for this, but mainly because Pope Leo XIII in his historic Encyclical Rerum Novarum addressed the social question in the context of the first great industrial revolution. In our own day, the Church offers to everyone the treasury of her social teaching in response to another industrial revolution and to developments in the field of artificial intelligence that pose new challenges for the defence of human dignity, justice and labour.
Dear brothers, I would like to conclude the first part of our meeting by making my own – and proposing to you as well – the hope that Saint Paul VI expressed at the inauguration of his Petrine
Ministry in 1963: “May it pass over the whole world like a great flame of faith and love kindled in all men and women of good will. May it shed light on paths of mutual cooperation and bless humanity abundantly, now and always, with the very strength of God, without whose help nothing is valid, nothing is holy” (Message Qui Fausto Die addressed to the entire human family, 22 June 1963).May these also be our sentiments, to be translated into prayer and commitment, with the Lord’s help. Thank you!”
-
-
So to sum it up he is saying his mission is to continue what Bergoglio started.
-
-
From Father Paul Kramer :+"""""""Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist." - Message of La Salette.+JESUS CHRIST SPEAKS ON INCLUSIVITY: He brings a sword of separation -- separating the sheep from the goats. Luke 12: 51 "Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation."+Matthew Chapter 10: 34 “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. 36 And a person's enemies will be those of his own household."+PREVOST - THE ADVERSARY OF CHRISTPrevost wants to bring "peace" by means of "inclusivity" -- by means of "synodality", and of "collegiality" and "dialogue" -- all of which set him in direct opposition to Christ. We cannot "include" and "dialogue" with everything and everyone who refuses to renounce and reject what we renounced and rejected by our baptismal vows. Synodal Inclusionism is a repeat of the ancient heresy that led the ancient Israelites to defect from the true religion by including pagan rites and mixing paganism with the religion of Moses and the prophets. Dialogue and inclusion have brought about the defection of Rome from the Catholic faith as was foretold by the ancient Fathers, quoted by Cardinal Henry Edward Manning in 1861. Prevost's wholehearted endorsement of the Bergoglian agenda yesterday in his message to the cardinals reveals what he really is -- a HERETIC. He has not ticked individually all the boxes on the Bergoglian agenda one by one, but most importantly, he ticked the last one -- the one that says "ALL OF THE ABOVE".The difference between Bergoglio and Prevost is that Prevost wears a more convincing Catholic mask, but his agenda is the same as Bergoglio's: "To Deceive even the Elect." - Matt. 24:24
-
Permalink Reply by Karen Kim on
-
Thank you and God bless you for posting these warnings about the new pope and his agenda.
-
Permalink Reply by Daniel M on
-
The Pope From Chicago, IL. Dolton, was an old steel town on Lake Michigan.
© 2025 Created by Dawn Marie.
Powered by
