Another View of Humility
Humility and Matthew Crawley
Matthew Crawley became heir to Downton Abbey and the its title quite suddenly and unexpectedly when the former heir died on the Titanic.
Crawley, a country lawyer by trade, had never known the kind of life lived at Downton Abbey. On the outside it seemed like a life of pointless privilege and unnecessary trappings.
When he first arrived, Matthew refused to let anybody help him do in anything. He had no use for the maids, the footmen, but he especially eschewed his valet. When his valet tried to dress him, Matthew wouldn't allow it. When the valet tried to offer assistance in picking out a pair of cuff-links, Matthew dismissed the notion and his valet as silly. The valet felt useless and the pain of such dismissal was obvious on his face.
Matthew was simpler and he was proud of that simplicity. He had never needed anyone to help him dress before and he didn't see why he would need one now. And the clothing, ugh, the clothing. Matthew much preferred his plain ol' suit to tuxedos and tails. His initial instinct was that all these accoutrements and formality was mere flash and frippery and he would quickly dispense with it all.
Yet, Lord Grantham counseled him that while all this grand tradition might seem purposeless, it was not. He explained to Matthew that these traditions meant something, not only to the people blandished upon, but to the people who provided the service and to others as well. Lord Grantham explained to Matthew that when he dismissed it all as useless, he was dismissing the value of lives and livelihoods spent learning the craft and the legitimate pride taken in hard work and diligence. He suggested that the service of the servants served not only their masters.
Over time, Matthew began to realize that their was some truth in Lord Grantham's words and being a kind and considerate man, he pondered it. Perhaps his insistence on simplicity was just another form of pride? Perhaps in accepting his new role, the truly humble thing to do was forgo his preference for simplicity, self-reliance, and plainness? In accepting his new role, he had a responsibility to others for whom these things meant a great deal.
And so, in an act of humility and kindness, Matthew asked his valet to help him dress and said, "Would you be so kind as to pick me out a pair of cuff-links." The valet smiled from ear to ear. Good Matthew had never been so humble and so self-effacing as when he accepted the assistance and adornments expected of his new role.
Matthew learned that simplicity is not always humility and pomp not always pride.
As the coming weeks and months unfold, we would all do well keep this lesson in mind.
Views: 95
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Cathleen on
-
Thank you, Michael, for this post.
One saint who immediately comes to mind in all of this is Pope St. Pius X. If anyone had a simple and humble life, from start to finish, it was him and his family, esp. his saintly mother. Even as Pope he remained so, but did not eschew the traditions and such of his office. He understood that he was the Pope and Vicar of Christ Himself, and really the honor was shown to the office, not necessarily to himself.
Good St. Pius X, please pray for your children in these confusing and dangerous times.
-
Permalink Reply by Dawn Marie on
-
Humility, Magnanimity and Magnificence
True Humility Is Not Contrary to Legitimate Splendor and Honors
The virtue of humility, at least in its external aspects, arouses much sympathy even among those who are not particularly religious or otherwise oppose religion.
In a world dominated by pride and sensuality, it seems very timely to study this virtue, however briefly.
An Interior Act of Submission to God
As with any virtue, we must first consider humility in its interior aspect, its essence.
There is no better teacher to lead us in this task than the [great] Doctor, Saint Thomas Aquinas.
According to him, “humility properly regards the subjection of man to God.”[1] Therefore, it predisposes man to practice all the virtues, which consist in submitting our intellect and will to God.
Saint Thomas Aquinas (Angelicus Doctor), lays down the principle that one virtue cannot contradict another. Humility is perfected and guided by the virtue of prudence, thereby avoiding errors that may cause scandal and confusion.
Being Detached Without Despising the Gifts Received
Humility leads to detachment from self. It moderates our desire for excellence, keeping it in due proportion[2] and leads to a healthy self-abasement. But when this is done to seek one’s own glory, it is false humility, a fruit of pride.[3]
True humility does not prevent us from recognizing the gifts received from God. “It is a sign of humility if a man does not think too much of himself, observing his own faults; but if a man contemns the good things he has received from God, this, far from being a proof of humility, shows him to be ungrateful.”[4]
There Is No Contradiction Among Virtues
Saint Thomas lays down the principle that there can be no contradiction between one virtue and another.[5] Therefore there is no contradiction, for example, between the virtue of humility, on the one hand, and the virtues of magnanimity and magnificence on the other.
Thus, humility and magnanimity complete one another because “a twofold virtue is necessary with regard to the difficult good: one, to temper and restrain the mind, lest it tend to high things immoderately; and this belongs to the virtue of humility: and another to strengthen the mind against despair, and urge it on to the pursuit of great things according to right reason; and this is magnanimity.”[6]
“[M]agnanimity urges the mind to great things in accord with right reason. Hence it is clear that magnanimity is not opposed to humility: indeed they concur in this, that each is according to right reason.”[7]
A Seeming Contradiction
The reason why humility seems to contradict magnanimity is because these virtues consider two different aspects: “magnanimity makes a man deem himself worthy of great things in consideration of the gifts he holds from God: thus if his soul is endowed with great virtue, magnanimity makes him tend to perfect works of virtue; and the same is to be said of the use of any other good, such as science or external fortune. On the other hand, humility makes a man think little of himself in consideration of his own deficiency.”[8]
To Despise Honors Is to Despise the Ornament of Virtues
“Those are worthy of praise who despise riches in such a way as to do nothing unbecoming in order to obtain them, nor have too great a desire for them. If, however, one were to despise honors so as not to care to do what is worthy of honor, this would be deserving of blame.”[9]
“Magnanimity,” Saint Thomas concludes, “is the ornament of all the virtues.”[10]
Humility and Splendor
Humility does not clash with the virtue of magnificence, through which we seek splendor, especially in God’s worship. This is because the magnificent does not seek greatness as such but rather for God’s glory.
“The intention of magnificence is the production of a great work. Now works done by men are directed to an end: and no end of human works is so great as the honor of God: wherefore magnificence does a great work especially in reference to the Divine honor. Wherefore the Philosopher [Aristotle] says (Ethic. iv, 2) that ‘the most commendable expenditure is that which is directed to Divine sacrifices’: and this is the chief object of magnificence. For this reason magnificence is connected with holiness, since its chief effect is directed to religion or holiness.”[11]Humility Is Guided by Prudence
For Saint Thomas, humility, like all moral virtues, is perfected and guided by the virtue of prudence, the first of the virtues when it comes to practical action.
Prudence, he says, is “the principal virtue in practical matters.”[12] “Prudence [is] the complement of all the moral virtues…. [T]he knowledge of prudence pertains to all the virtues.”[13] “Prudence is the conductor of the virtues.”[14]
Thus, the practice of humility should be guided by prudence by applying general principles to concrete situations[15] and thus avoiding an erroneous assessment of occasions, circumstances and posts in which a person should practice humility. Prudence therefore avoids, in the practice of humility, errors which may cause scandal and confusion by disparaging one’s own office, especially ecclesiastical, and by showing contempt for the virtues of magnanimity and magnificence, whose practice is required by the office.
Accepting Honors in Submission to God
Honors due to superiors may be owed because of their personal virtue or because of the excellence of their office; for this latter reason, even bad superiors must be honored: “A wicked superior is honored for the excellence, not of his virtue but of his dignity, as being God’s minister, and because the honor paid to him is paid to the whole community over which he presides.”[16]
Since the essence of humility is the inner act of submission to God, the external manifestations of this virtue should be aligned with this submission to the divine will, which has called someone to high office — whether civil or ecclesiastical — by accepting the splendor and honors linked thereto.
Summarizing
Humility is the virtue by which we fully submit ourselves to God and moderate our disproportionate desires of grandeur. Through the virtue of humility we abase ourselves in consideration of our faults and smallness before God.
The virtues of magnanimity and magnificence drive us to great achievements and incline us to pursue excellence and splendor.
Just as we honor those who are superior to us either because of their virtue or their office, so also we should receive the honors destined to us on account of the gifts we have received from the Creator or the office we occupy. We credit these honors to God and to the dignity of the office, rather than to our personal merits.
Since the moral virtues are guided by prudence, we should not perform public acts of abasement inconsistent with our office, as in doing so we would commit an act of imprudence and give occasion for scandal and confusion, shaking the faith of others.
Due to the harmonious unity existing between all the virtues, regardless of the circumstances, we cannot emphasize one virtue against another — at least in people’s eyes.
“Humility Is to Walk in Truth” (Saint Teresa)
It is worth recalling here the words of Saint Teresa of Avila:“Once I was wondering why Our Lord was so fond of this virtue of humility and the answer immediately occurred to me: It is because God is the supreme Truth, and humility is to walk in truth; so it is well for us to see that all we have is misery and nothingness; and he who does not understand that, walks in a lie.”[17]
Humility expresses the truth about ourselves and about others and counters false humility, which is based on a lie.1.St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, II-II, q. 162, a. 1c; cf. ibid. q. 161 a.1, ad 5, and a.2, ad 3.↑2.Cf. Ibid., II-II, q. 160 a. 2c.↑3.Ibid., II-II q. 161, a.1 ad 2.↑4.Ibid., I-II, q.35, a.1 ad 3.↑5.Ibid., II-II, q. 129, a3 obj. 4.↑6.Ibid., II-II, q. 161, a.1c.↑7.Ibid., II-II, q. 161, a.1, ad 3.↑8.Ibid., II-II, q. 129, a.3, ad 4.↑9.Ibid., II-II, q. 129 a.1 ad 3.↑10.Ibid., II-II, q. 129, a4, ad 3.↑11.Ibid., II-II, 134 a.2 ad 3.↑12.Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, book VI, no. 1256, translated by C. I. Litzinger, O.P., (Notre Dame, Ind.L Dumb Ox Books, 1993).↑13.Summa Theologica, II-II, 166 a.2 ad 1.↑14.II Sententiarum, dist. 41, q. 1, a.1 ob. 3.↑15.Summa Theologica, II-II q. 47, a.6c.↑16.Cf. Ibid., II-II q. 103, a. 2 ad 2.↑17.St. Teresa of Avila, Las Moradas, chapter 10, no. 7,
© 2025 Created by Dawn Marie.
Powered by
